Re: [tsvwg] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-08: (with COMMENT)

[Benoit Claise <[e-mail]>]

Hi David,

Do what's right/what you want. I believe we have spent enough time 
already on this one :-)

Regards, 
Benoit-who-filed-a-stupid-editorial-comment-to-show-the-world-he-read-the-draft.
> Benoit,
>
>>   The DTLS implementation MUST support DTLS 1.0 [RFC4347] and SHOULD
>>     support the most recently published version of DTLS, which is DTLS
>>     1.2 [RFC6347] as of December 2014.
>>
>> December 2014 is wrong.
> Nitpick department ;-) - as of Dec 2014, DTLS 1.2 [RFC6347] is the most
> recently published (as an RFC) version of DTLS, even though that RFC was
> published in Jan 2012, so the quoted text is actually correct ;-).
>
> Nonetheless, here's a clearer suggestion:
>
> OLD
>       support the most recently published version of DTLS, which is DTLS
>       1.2 [RFC6347] as of December 2014.
> NEW
>       support the most recently published version of DTLS, which was DTLS
>       1.2 [RFC6347] when this RFC was published (XXXXXXXXX 2015).
>
>       RFC Editor: please fill in publication month of this RFC and ensure
>       that correctness of the above statement is checked during AUTH48.
> END
>
> Thanks,
> --David
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tsvwg [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Benoit Claise
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 4:34 PM
>> To: The IESG
>> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; draft-
>> [e-mail]
>> Subject: [tsvwg] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-
>> encaps-08: (with COMMENT)
>>
>> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-08: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>   The DTLS implementation MUST support DTLS 1.0 [RFC4347] and SHOULD
>>     support the most recently published version of DTLS, which is DTLS
>>     1.2 [RFC6347] as of December 2014.
>>
>> December 2014 is wrong.
>>