Re: [tsvwg] some old abbreviations

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Sat, 29 February 2020 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441703A093E for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 04:17:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id INXd_jYRhDBQ for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 04:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy10-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.20.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7B7B3A093B for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 04:17:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmgw11.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.11]) by gproxy10.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DB7140C8E for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 05:17:34 -0700 (MST)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 813ljhig5BFyO813ljs32K; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 05:17:34 -0700
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=ZPv5Z0zb c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10:nop_charset_1 a=l697ptgUJYAA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=gBGs-GNDAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=rPtgJbdB7drNKg-_x-sA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10:nop_charset_2 a=dognii86VrYA:10:uccc_2email_address a=-FEs8UIgK8oA:10:nop_fastflux_domain_1 a=NWVoK91CQyQA:10:nop_rescan a=FRnfNA8HkZbsn1vFUcqg:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=tzyJaEhi3sDs0lyJH4m1NS0mKqZrJe1ZLtQDvtfZCuo=; b=vjewJ3r2PCdNtzldMO12dPQwJ3 /DwN5VLGupUamzH3ca51KDgyVgbystMgq6bSYp2FXi0SQFe6qt+nfef0GLwrDSbingThZLdvPRIWI JtGmHKi+r2ESQnhShD0hSjRY9;
Received: from pool-72-66-11-201.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([72.66.11.201]:35406 helo=[11.5.0.140]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1j813l-000lRt-L6; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 05:17:33 -0700
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 07:17:33 -0500
Message-ID: <17090e15b48.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <8335e463-1947-3902-db8f-b8c4f145e72d@pi.nu>
References: <8335e463-1947-3902-db8f-b8c4f145e72d@pi.nu>
User-Agent: AquaMail/1.22.0-1511 (build: 102200004)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 72.66.11.201
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1j813l-000lRt-L6
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-72-66-11-201.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([11.5.0.140]) [72.66.11.201]:35406
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/EnjFhucmv_qQ38lnNRfrDtHORIs>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] some old abbreviations
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 12:17:49 -0000

Loa,

Perhaps it's the RED precursor, "random drop". Google found this bit of 
history -
http://tnlandforms.us/ipp05/p1-mankin.pdf

Lou


----------
On February 28, 2020 9:28:20 PM Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I'm not subscribed to this list, but have a small favor to ask.
>
> I'm working on an update of RFC 3272, the document we are working on
> have a paragraph in section
>
> "The schemes described in the short time scale (e.g., RED and its
> variations, > ECN, LQD, and RND)."
>
> RED is Random Early Detection
> ECN is Explicit Congestion Notification
>
> Magnus helped me find Loss and Quieng Delay control (LQD).
>
> I have not been able to find RND, anyone that can help?
>
>
> The latest version of the document we are working on is:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-07
>
> I plan to re-write part of the congestion text.
>
> /Loa
>
>
> -- 
>
>
> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
> Senior MPLS Expert
> Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
>
>