IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] RFC Number for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960bis

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Tue, 12 April 2022 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6852D3A0ABB for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:57:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lHBJId4KC-FH for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe33.google.com (mail-vs1-xe33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11FE33A0AA7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:57:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe33.google.com with SMTP id e23so1226099vsh.5 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=whoBqxcBI/YXMs5D9XwevCBQTAmT2ZfBMdxh81IWqYw=; b=Szd8lhQBMCoXzlnxkpofOawbFvEG9lNJD/3kXS95zzE12EqCLOGfufLxa30jJwYO+N WQNSnUEVmxxYwNFm8Cfy3H6f9hqzQXPo9TJvW8KzFKURwLqoeQo+SqnSEFPJ04GucBwz cLzz2ogHO5G4LQhO2T2JbgjubIifYHelTw4USNmKnN1yZLkjqJXKMT1mT6gQ0/fg+En2 gRFHtIg4Etd5+Umqd3mbNpgugz8jV9+rzxhn9fBNAxy0JJpntw71L1UxP7EaytA+w1Rx 7HWgbmDXoNt5MEnSpxUevUAEO2bEfnsN3mIFI6cmIt55xyNA2xkx+JqOjd+3CNDXDS0M gp3Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=whoBqxcBI/YXMs5D9XwevCBQTAmT2ZfBMdxh81IWqYw=; b=Ll6fg5HAM6S4glD1Nh6OnoHqW6CZEqKPORM81gz8d8QfPHeEwwCgP2GtkV+c68aCV1 emTFFMQiTq3XQdxERds5GpeP3aS+CZIfEDm0/6eLNfqNTV/Myv78zZ10sQvMpkJMWKaQ KPeoGp+DimheuEwbYOCWRjILpO0yrwjJCOiXgRdg+eMhbHIo/YY2Pw4ztdJMpOBxC33P I98ts4MVXxXf3xsmHwpuQrLmp+vcwJXEwTm6BvgFEHLRQmWo5a2EjByPZSqSkEfEvz38 3m6uqapnFX9VuMBoDLECFOA1AsMCbdwdTLifAv0ZcbB231f5nn7EcJ5Wl7EINv5Et05B 6HfA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mF+y2Zxx7zD1ExB7uGeTb2e6oSZ6j1CwOJD20GdxdB9lnjx// 5uvZiiYMVSnfB5YHwEUUYi0ij0e2T7ov1g/VLfA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxFBIQvbRG7/H2DEO1zju2TqfzICkMkobTYc7xLjRlj/nqeCy4f2FknkcxdVkZa2s1f1aO0dzoT67mlrBYTxCE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:3593:b0:325:8af7:fc61 with SMTP id h19-20020a056102359300b003258af7fc61mr11088417vsu.50.1649725038322; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:57:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM4esxQOzOWWS8Z_tfSimsDDYXdY2x=5ERp0Mq-2HPq5UL4dog@mail.gmail.com> <077790D6-F448-4DD9-AE4F-6B2F17B615F4@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <077790D6-F448-4DD9-AE4F-6B2F17B615F4@amsl.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 17:57:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxTk9n1Z-n76JVF9YnP8rtkZfOc5cp3XTFkQ4G-2S71aHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e2e7f005dc6a8a30"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/EuIgzYz3Zx9MJzzw25JUuqku5Jc>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] RFC Number for draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960bis
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:57:25 -0000

Ok, thanks.

On Mon, Apr 11, 2022, 16:16 Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> We are unable to accommodate this request, as 9460 is a 200+ number jump
> from the range in which we are currently assigning.  It’s not ideal as it
> would take us 9 months to a year to close the gap.
>
> Thanks,
> Sandy
>
>
> > On Apr 8, 2022, at 11:12 AM, Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello RFC Editor,
> >
> > This document is the third in a series, succeeding RFCs 2960 and 4960.
> >
> > Would it be possible to assign this document 9460?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Martin Duke
> > TSV AD
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email