IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] SCTP question

"Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.com> Wed, 24 October 2018 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <bidulock@openss7.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FE1129AB8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 07:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y6NsIFQV58j8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 07:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw.openss7.com (fw.openss7.com [142.59.210.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5D7B123FFD for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 07:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (ns5.evil.openss7.net [192.168.9.5]) by gw.openss7.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id w9O2s1Pc018819; Tue, 23 Oct 2018 20:54:01 -0600
Received: from wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id w9OEsM7S028469; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:54:22 -0600
Received: (from brian@localhost) by wilbur.pigworks.openss7.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id w9OEsJqw028468; Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:54:19 -0600
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 08:54:19 -0600
From: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.com>
To: Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Cc: philip.eardley@bt.com, perry.wilks@bt.com, tsvwg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tsvwg-2960bis@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20181024145419.GB28094@openss7.org>
Reply-To: bidulock@openss7.com
Mail-Followup-To: Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>, philip.eardley@bt.com, perry.wilks@bt.com, tsvwg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tsvwg-2960bis@ietf.org
References: <LOXP123MB08050FABE8A17B6BF1F7E64EEBFE0@LOXP123MB0805.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20181016173620.GB20870@hmswarspite.think-freely.org> <5e9e468a035341cea28066c14fddcc26@mera.ru> <LOXP123MB080505C9DDEC754008CEC070EBF40@LOXP123MB0805.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <F0B8D93E-699D-4C69-BC2C-6A338FABBA93@lurchi.franken.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <F0B8D93E-699D-4C69-BC2C-6A338FABBA93@lurchi.franken.de>
Organization: http://www.openss7.org/
Dsn-Notification-To: <bidulock@openss7.org>
X-Spam-To: <blockme@openss7.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/Iqs2a8XU6nsr7oMn19V8X6SHhoE>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] SCTP question
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 14:54:36 -0000

Michael,

Michael Tuexen wrote:			    (Mon, 22 Oct 2018 22:31:51)
> > On 22. Oct 2018, at 12:01, philip.eardley@bt.com wrote:
> > 
> > Do other people agree?- especially Randall, as editor of RFC4960, and other people who've been involved a lot with SCTP?
> I agree with the other people... I interpret it as a SHALL.
> 

I interpreted it as SHALL as well.

-- 
Brian F. G. Bidulock
bidulock@openss7.com
http://www.openss7.com/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email