RE: [Tsvwg] <draft-lefaucheur-emergency-rsvp> : Preemption scope

Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com> Tue, 06 June 2006 15:42 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FndhG-0005Cx-K7; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:42:22 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FndhF-0005Cq-9I for tsvwg@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:42:21 -0400
Received: from amer-mta07.csc.com ([20.137.52.151]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FndhE-0000Rf-2F for tsvwg@ietf.org; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:42:21 -0400
Received: from amer-gw09.csc.com (amer-gw09.csc.com [20.6.39.245]) by amer-mta07.csc.com (Switch-3.1.6/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k56FgJ49022274; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 11:42:19 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <OF0FD8982F.5B18BDAC-ON85257185.004E2340-85257185.0052E8DC@csc.com>
Subject: RE: [Tsvwg] <draft-lefaucheur-emergency-rsvp> : Preemption scope
To: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes 652HF83 November 04, 2004
Message-ID: <OF4EC2AD9F.8529ACCD-ON85257185.005618C1-85257185.00564546@csc.com>
From: Janet P Gunn <jgunn6@csc.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:42:17 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on AMER-GW09/SRV/CSC(Release 6.5.3|September 14, 2004) at 06/06/2006 11:41:19 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
Cc: andren@ncs.gov, bidulock@openss7.org, nguyena@ncs.gov, tsvwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org




I said

 If I remember correctly, one of Joseph  Babiarz IDs hinted at this
behavior, with a variant on RSVP as the mechanism.

I take it back.
I was thinking of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw-reduction-00.txt,
A Resource Reservation Extension for the Reduction of
                  Bandwidth of a Reservation Flow

                        February 10th, 2005

 James Polk
 Subha Dhesikan
  Cisco Systems

 but it doesn't seem to have survived on line.

Janet


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to
bind CSC to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written
agreement or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail
for such purpose.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------