IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] L4S: Guard DSCP

Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> Mon, 03 May 2021 06:55 UTC

Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327BE3A0BCC for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 May 2021 23:55:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q4xwtHiwMwjC for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 May 2021 23:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B42B63A0BC5 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 May 2021 23:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id y9so567886ljn.6 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 May 2021 23:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=u6H59SiEGPmqd98VW6sc3OtYFhrIM8+utkFze1pENes=; b=ZzR58FVE0lWIRG+txEpUxvglnXh/WlMKguC1CnXPvtOdZd158q2T2dW7T3nPGuFlDv GdmJhVL0YpUj+X80o8TdeF6G4MUDwOdnSThQqxiKtdDxTybwh/JlnVirFdqLz6iwCqR4 q/c7P1SGfrIt+jw0GK8miAuIkWRERY6G15wCQQbIh6cU1Xau99XotQ1xUmu/S7jdPdpI RvU3Kv7dTGMnDZOlH8CGoh7WKj1Z3pR2pyYCnYwIgclZck85PkaNODWGwS80YL2/wKPH lPnczCvuD70Um93J1FBLY3MNIJrULQ2b7PXfWSOnm8B3t5t1icH0clDPtqY02XWPAsp1 FOCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=u6H59SiEGPmqd98VW6sc3OtYFhrIM8+utkFze1pENes=; b=LevyA/R9RSrNiwFjwiefjCK83FEqHWr4Vu6Rm0VH9l9ioIB7DYPNMfECoadFbqYY2g 6kudK4NuG/k+gEjN+/zyupOxmMnuCrJ7N4nqrXdS5D6o5vXxpfLNSdUbstvGkSEeO0Wj 7DEpeDAJCXEzyDaR9ja9v+aQuJwxLWGtK7hsxRkeHH7jPm1ujhRzpWZtuFM+c4KKYGtj YIcZFe7ZVtQWIo0TqXWf9qsSsN6fHei47bxXvCKaQQkc/XSj96p96IQ+/S/6YYlSd4Sg rBx0lUGNtFbvGdupA8h8qgjgT74lJcEFBK/BwLC88s0+8Ua9mCfqD+Kkc6kkqjAdq6+6 1zZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mMr4q5rXPLBoTinRIzMFd0DIpGKx4wY5u0XLVcKKqzhvmPf/N S4q9qTpg6RiBbnpC9Pkdzn+odITKp08=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLaS7KbnXFvLv5OpAgo9HPIn6jfZ3gzufu/RWRJ5NWimOGk45ILQVTF6Mimk5/sbP4UeeSzA==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a7d1:: with SMTP id x17mr12514856ljp.384.1620024941577; Sun, 02 May 2021 23:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (178-55-25-11.bb.dnainternet.fi. [178.55.25.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z11sm1174468ljc.121.2021.05.02.23.55.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 02 May 2021 23:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.7\))
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0701MB2299349100A102385B7EFBBFC25B9@HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 09:55:39 +0300
Cc: Greg White <g.white@CableLabs.com>, TSVWG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <41F0E5E1-5F89-4877-A8F8-6F692A139B77@gmail.com>
References: <MN2PR19MB4045D7179410986A46C3E30783469@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <458e847061d1dd6a45bfa5bec046d201e88c8075.camel@heistp.net> <CACL_3VE3rfmAZewOCWTzfC5A9v7c2HgZ8NAxdt_5qKg5Rn0QNQ@mail.gmail.com> <a9e0781559a0ca4fcf02c225b67d3037bc56ea8f.camel@heistp.net> <02DBC945-B1D5-4A70-8906-E48831951C5C@gmx.de> <CACL_3VF8Nt-fH9RwncFVVvwicuON7A_R6JU8Y_OXqBwTOpdmKw@mail.gmail.com> <64AC29EE-2576-41C4-8411-7C66518A3853@gmail.com> <CACL_3VG3M-jFOHkCPCinnDP3G=gYU_0nnDz5Qwi9BJ501PrZFg@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR19MB404525C9FD6052D0A195F44683429@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <CACL_3VGDd80FeqrH+8_2+Chbh-cT9-bpW-gfH7itSgXN3=_cbA@mail.gmail.com> <MN2PR19MB4045FE83AE49A3317476A6BD83419@MN2PR19MB4045.namprd19.prod.outlook.com> <C8C168F2-59F0-438D-9ACB-A63D1F310D91@cablelabs.com> <CACL_3VEa8kRBY20RRP5vWLwBGUcVkBD73rSjsiY82mkj0VN8aw@mail.gmail.com> <DCA82FEF-4DA0-4612-ABAC-9FD4AE2D5AED@cablelabs.com> <C9725925-FACA-4176-8829-91B99B009224@gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB22999B42745A0881726AD185C25B9@HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <22D01160-D0B5-4A42-8E4A-F0326F923E8C@gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB2299349100A102385B7EFBBFC25B9@HE1PR0701MB2299.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/LZsLT8Cj9zD-0BDhFhiSomyCMSM>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] L4S: Guard DSCP
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 06:55:49 -0000

> On 3 May, 2021, at 9:52 am, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> You have to weight the risks/benefits with your standpoint and
> how/if you wish to adapt to L4S, that's nothing that I (or anybody else?)
> can decide for you.

But that is the whole problem - why should I, or Joe Random Public, have to "adapt to L4S" in order for L4S to be safely deployable?  We should not.  L4S should adapt to accommodate already-standardised, already-deployed infrastructure - or die.

 - Jonathan Morton

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email