IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] adoption call for UDP options-based DPLPMTUD

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Wed, 22 September 2021 06:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 076E23A0028 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:30:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id puQ9IqvorOr8 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:30:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E09B23A0033 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.71]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr20.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4HDpMB0hv2z1ytg; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:30:30 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1632292230; bh=1wxAd8E1exPITs6VcOlmyDxArOhARMP8arvIK60X9is=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; b=BtJ7oVTQVT87qq0Q/XLa555Szu4MoB5qH0IpxbxWTZpITFr3KQOntc2DMHdX/Q+uy LarszfM1cmCswCiRQi5fWYcks7/oQmiP+DC5Tv3FtA0xqHnuPfThvFXpa7V1oQ4ry+ M1cKr3RLxY224r1JqVRaOzMQChdxSFlWHVUAeW9hi2OQXZAYO4+Diji7pq+3r6oG4Z GTeYkiVnQxjSHAdkOXbSJRLY9AXD9Y2jP19+qGHCfN/GrkMRelZnEqDMAyXPsWBKAG LvJgeHLqGPqNmW55IFRJUyg6KDzDT0cspy43snfEAVKIBg7BIBqZta3bgzgwFujkTS r0W9dhRBjVfRQ==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr07.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4HDpM96xMyzFpWf; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:30:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] adoption call for UDP options-based DPLPMTUD
Thread-Index: AQHXr0f+QmidOKIVHE6qtEyZTs8i+Kuvl5ww
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:30:29 +0000
Message-ID: <29138_1632292230_614ACD85_29138_447_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303540A5B3@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <159a1a5a-7f46-32c4-0606-620afbb44d68@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <159a1a5a-7f46-32c4-0606-620afbb44d68@mti-systems.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/Nha-0XFXSHzRxtlKjfGx1LaxNLY>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] adoption call for UDP options-based DPLPMTUD
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:30:37 -0000

Hi Wes, all,

I support adopting this work. 

I still think the codepoints should be requested in this document rather than the main UDP option. If not, a normative reference should be added to the main UDP document to point to this one. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : tsvwg [mailto:tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Wesley Eddy
> Envoyé : mercredi 22 septembre 2021 02:23
> À : tsvwg@ietf.org
> Objet : [tsvwg] adoption call for UDP options-based DPLPMTUD
> 
> Following up on the actions from our interim meeting earlier in the
> month, the chairs want to start an adoption call on the list for the
> draft on DPLPMTUD using UDP options.  This is proposed to be worked in
> parallel to the main UDP options draft.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-udp-options-
> dplpmtud/
> 
> There was pretty strong support for this in the interim meeting, so
> please respond if you would disagree with adopting this draft.
> 


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email