Re: [tsvwg] adoption call for UDP options-based DPLPMTUD
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Mon, 25 October 2021 00:32 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F50F3A098A for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.227
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.227 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mti-systems-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HN-2cPl6dNX5 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82f.google.com (mail-qt1-x82f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E63F3A0982 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82f.google.com with SMTP id c28so8841449qtv.11 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mti-systems-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language :from:to:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QoBJ54VSuZyViQub+KsK91K28Ou7mbsltGZaEkGgJmg=; b=ckxC6d64hxsSqC3IclRYEsduw+D1p2FLtEYw4v8E+hWfQKbjm1qgVgFJd9WeUyU3xQ 5KaA3HZ0fnKDQFVDDxz02B/O7LhWnUpKSUbR8PLKfsEXPe7L2FpHA03GFE1l2Lhvg9B9 Sc5Ya9E84+0bDcrCeMPjL2RQGPaEL7QJLJ6uxxVtJOay2WLk2g/W+4RX6XYo/XfaGMXw V3BMXRFJCMjssy8vGraS+bWIECJUol90Mp7O3wsBhlpyGyEIjhxgy0b4Lt8p9ihJiG/W 23hfZHcBD96O1e1X44wlzRUOb+veH5cYFaEU2H9ClirhXF14rDq5hoFMXhk8jZ5CudeN zxYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:from:to:references:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QoBJ54VSuZyViQub+KsK91K28Ou7mbsltGZaEkGgJmg=; b=pxVhbEeWMYd/aU9S7ULmllzAsbvPM3XL7IOvm3SUFWZld8OPF7Ln3vMcsQ+pzNEIKT k6J2W8KynHSp33tMIqyN/rDI03h49zBYYyWJKCPx/lC2jhXvU46UWXDzLgfgFxq45TOY Dx3TniDC8JsQHiDtYWb5XGEzMh28LzeIhICTAYdAOftOY6XPrQpVHd+hqKGFYDR+emzK nopGtXZkOWlF7qAqEbk1ix+97ZLFXGxb/5btMJY5smeDKW0QxmeI4cAflJFOkPQcaj4K J0yZudjWsMorHezpsp0qY7/mbeAfmdmblw0VlbY9WSSiqP6KVacwibRMwknstLdnyj6Q HhyA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531GkiEsi8wVuAgaAenjxYMYsEOU6HamSdJ1lTxwp5jbFM4HuKmq dHcSCMbXgG2KKWzRuCc2iz+E3pI9USTabA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyXQob7jVzdRtZ0/2chNLpLQ1Xuv682NuJSm8EgtlxSaTylHQ76nrd2R3Xbe4Fdnm48k+Kz3g==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5f4f:: with SMTP id y15mr14010244qta.326.1635121928787; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.17] (cpe-66-61-72-87.neo.res.rr.com. [66.61.72.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t26sm7732136qtq.77.2021.10.24.17.32.06 for <tsvwg@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <0aa4bc21-5bcd-ffe9-6c0d-bd119c65d135@mti-systems.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 20:31:59 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0
Content-Language: en-US
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
To: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <159a1a5a-7f46-32c4-0606-620afbb44d68@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <159a1a5a-7f46-32c4-0606-620afbb44d68@mti-systems.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/ZG3ezc56K8y3BW5XmFqtLboI7Lg>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] adoption call for UDP options-based DPLPMTUD
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 00:32:15 -0000
We didn't hear from anyone that opposed adopting this draft, so following the support on the list and from the meeting, I think the authors should go ahead and submit a WG draft version, and we will add a charter milestone for this. On 9/21/2021 8:22 PM, Wesley Eddy wrote: > Following up on the actions from our interim meeting earlier in the > month, the chairs want to start an adoption call on the list for the > draft on DPLPMTUD using UDP options. This is proposed to be worked in > parallel to the main UDP options draft. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-udp-options-dplpmtud/ > > > There was pretty strong support for this in the interim meeting, so > please respond if you would disagree with adopting this draft. > >
- [tsvwg] adoption call for UDP options-based DPLPM… Wesley Eddy
- Re: [tsvwg] adoption call for UDP options-based D… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [tsvwg] adoption call for UDP options-based D… Wesley Eddy