Re: [Tsvwg] Comments on: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw-reduction-01.txt
Antonio De Simone <antonio.desimone@jhuapl.edu> Fri, 09 September 2005 00:37 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EDWtx-00079U-Rw; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:37:57 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EDWtw-00079G-6x for tsvwg@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:37:56 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA07908 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Sep 2005 20:37:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pilot.jhuapl.edu ([128.244.198.200] helo=jhuapl.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EDWxP-0008MP-1t for tsvwg@ietf.org; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:41:32 -0400
Received: from ([128.244.96.247]) by pilot.jhuapl.edu with ESMTP id KP-BRARG.4477299; Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:37:20 -0400
Message-ID: <4320D93F.9090809@jhuapl.edu>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 20:37:19 -0400
From: Antonio De Simone <antonio.desimone@jhuapl.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: [Tsvwg] Comments on: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw-reduction-01.txt
References: <200509082250.PAA10049@gra.isi.edu>
In-Reply-To: <200509082250.PAA10049@gra.isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-bounces@ietf.org
Bob Braden wrote: > The priority of flows is a > higher-level notion that has no place in RSVP itself. > Bob, I don't know if draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw-reduction-01.txt is a bad idea, but I have heard many bad ideas on this topic. I'd like to hear a good idea. Do you have a notion of how priority of flows, which is, exactly as you say, a higher-level notion tied to policy and not to characteristics of the traffic, would be supported? Tony > Layering and modularity in protocols matters. > > Bob Braden > _______________________________________________ tsvwg mailing list tsvwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg
- [Tsvwg] Comments on: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw-red… Bob Braden
- Re: [Tsvwg] Comments on: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw… Antonio De Simone
- Re: [Tsvwg] Comments on: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw… Fred Baker
- RE: [Tsvwg] Comments on: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-bw… Dhesikan, Subha