Re: [tsvwg] ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-06.txt>

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 February 2015 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id EB2B21A872E; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:24:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1311A872E; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:24:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vpuojjY-Stfc; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:24:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B37911A8725; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id u10so6207856lbd.7; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:24:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5uFa432a22Y/OKe+V0saNGwg/49sKb+rh7BzyJ3INig=; b=S7smd9gEAC6cRwBId8RDlEi8lHnwS/4gMpijUYeEbQsI2ogbAO6Bc0Cor0pxaxpDg9 dVq5Fa8QpE/dnFp0HIcxiYocEOFCtWNtmJ0dlwhBaDt1oiZNJ6tcZblgcj8PdeFwwAw0 OMkvmiFN06vdk5fDad6gAJQnYY40z5UOSPS845W65IwK+LggX29P0ZwtXs/FPGHItWuV 5IKYGkby/y0fwgU8U0nVA/LGKChktsTe8cXPIimrKjAw9bzJINmd2tXgfK42Hfm5u9hx xuiLweZBDD93kweCD5Pr9F8ef6ZWlJvGD+IaaFXHtg8g0aFqBp3cUojfe3LX98SwEScB GsKw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.4.233 with SMTP id n9mr4267274lan.61.1423247043063; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.152.4.167 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:24:03 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20150205175009.25422.39379.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20150205175009.25422.39379.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:24:03 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-e4=0DzZNW_xPvTmckYRABXWuM9e0NpptDtw1SBF2zJjw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013d11986df6f0050e6f861a"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/PgVpg_jwsnfpWyz47UxrcKhHaxU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:38:11 -0800
Cc: "gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies.all@ietf.org, "tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org" <tsvwg-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] ID Tracker State Update Notice: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-06.txt>
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 18:24:13 -0000

Hi, Michael,

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:50 AM, IETF Secretariat <
ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> wrote:

> IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed
> from IESG Evaluation
> ID Tracker URL:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies/


So, I think I'm just waiting to approve the next version of this draft, is
that right?

Thanks,

Spencer