IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] WG now part of .all alias?

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 11 February 2015 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509611A8889; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:54:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cjIIrSFDm_sa; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DED81A8955; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 06:54:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-96-107-228.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.96.107.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t1BEsNsY095281 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:54:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-96-107-228.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.96.107.228] claimed to be unnumerable.local
Message-ID: <54DB6D1B.6050002@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:54:19 -0600
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <54D65EB4.9080902@gmail.com> <54DB6BF9.7020501@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54DB6BF9.7020501@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------090607020409050904020802"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/rL2EwLyqh6FoORBQKUTGCs5snS8>
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] WG now part of .all alias?
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:54:32 -0000

On 2/11/15 8:49 AM, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
> Hi, Robert,
>
> I thought I knew what was included in the .all aliases, but it looks 
> like that's now including the working group, which is in the notify 
> field.
>
> Is that true?
.all includes any address in any other alias, including .notify

.notify is exactly what is in the "Send notices to" (aka notify) field.

If the group appears in the "Send notices to" field, it will be included 
in .all
>
> Spencer
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: 	Re: [tsvwg] ID Tracker State Update Notice: 
> <draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies-06.txt>
> Date: 	Sun, 08 Feb 2015 07:51:32 +1300
> From: 	Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
> Organization: 	University of Auckland
> To: 	tsvwg@ietf.org
>
>
>
> No, no, wait, it looks as if the WG has been added to the .all alias:
>
> X-Original-To:expand-draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies.all@virtual.ietf.org
> Delivered-To:tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
>
> Please not!
>
> 1) That is surely not the intent of the .all aliases.
> 2) Worse, it's effectively a BCC and that breaks filtering rules
> so it ends up in the wrong inbox.
>
> Regards
>     Brian
>
> On 07/02/2015 07:24, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
> > Hi, Michael,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:50 AM, IETF Secretariat <
> >ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> >> IESG state changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed
> >> from IESG Evaluation
> >> ID Tracker URL:
> >>http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-prpolicies/
> >
> >
> > So, I think I'm just waiting to approve the next version of this draft, is
> > that right?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Spencer
> >
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email