IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Time slot request for the new topic around MP-DCCP

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Tue, 12 March 2019 22:31 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D128C12426E for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.219
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.219 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i0aMKM671uoC for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 206C71200D7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc: To:From:Date:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=r74ZWbLGWEJYHNHdTw1Oufb//mBy1GFASmuY/N/SDNE=; b=ptJ5vmEkGwWNWFPnqQo6kDvUd 866piOx1rF9xVipMLeKOW7pxt+ySy5u7wGlME/p9ELFEYKbjMhh0jRL1G5zs+nhc9eMOk4IeN7nwB qBKiwjSMuNQhFzRw2IZJemcgo64/MW9LQ/V21Y7lEFrh++kg66PXrspd/82Ii5uhX94jgm+CTO7vP UgSpkeQebRry0b+YFbCPvnizKcn6oZyqAP75knIhBJrqmLncW0JJL0VW5/fKkNXY2pjK6N073rYVZ Sm1JBpa43hNxgOVpm3nlrqhueF/EuQLXdy6CFIhtmrXBYIIeGhj108aw29599r0N6vjKa+2Vwf3pR FsmDOzZGw==;
Received: from [::1] (port=46922 helo=server217.web-hosting.com) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1h3pvt-004NVl-HD; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:31:38 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_d2821f9ac6adc6bf01678e3c07255f01"
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:31:37 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: Markus.Amend@telekom.de, tsvwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <F7D1FCE8-120A-4550-AEC0-3E064EC9596C@eggert.org>
References: <FRAPR01MB1170ECD397C0971E40C8A56EFA490@FRAPR01MB1170.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE> <F7D1FCE8-120A-4550-AEC0-3E064EC9596C@eggert.org>
Message-ID: <1b6de41eec70d07e286e150e08185634@strayalpha.com>
X-Sender: touch@strayalpha.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.3
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/RCLDQvXlI7QihgMh4P_htssS4Qk>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Time slot request for the new topic around MP-DCCP
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:31:41 -0000

PS - if this approach is still needed (see below), it would be useful to
address any potential interactions between UDP options and this
proposal. 

Joe 

On 2019-03-12 11:46, Lars Eggert wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On 2019-3-12, at 4:04, Markus.Amend@telekom.de wrote:
> 
>> Since the DCCP struggles with traversing todays middle-boxes (chicken-egg), U-DCCP in
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-amend-tsvwg-dccp-udp-header-conversion/
>> 
>> specifies a lossless and overhead free DCCP to UDP conversion, which is more efficient than traditional encapsulation solutions.
> 
> wouldn't the planned multipath support for QUIC address this use case? 
> 
> Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email