IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] Time slot request for the new topic around MP-DCCP

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 12 March 2019 18:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83FF213128C for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k_DkPRXLEGCK for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi [62.142.5.109]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EE981312B1 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eggert.org (unknown [62.248.255.8]) by emh03.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0431240038; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 20:46:52 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [172.22.82.57] (unknown [12.27.65.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28A9E642961; Tue, 12 Mar 2019 20:46:14 +0200 (EET)
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <F7D1FCE8-120A-4550-AEC0-3E064EC9596C@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_443AF8DE-4378-49D3-99C5-DB34E5777C3E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 11:46:11 -0700
In-Reply-To: <FRAPR01MB1170ECD397C0971E40C8A56EFA490@FRAPR01MB1170.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org
To: Markus.Amend@telekom.de
References: <FRAPR01MB1170ECD397C0971E40C8A56EFA490@FRAPR01MB1170.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
X-MailScanner-ID: 28A9E642961.A223C
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/u47Dy8rl2EM5LR2BW_ZCG3w2HUI>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Time slot request for the new topic around MP-DCCP
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:46:58 -0000

Hi,

On 2019-3-12, at 4:04, Markus.Amend@telekom.de wrote:
> Since the DCCP struggles with traversing todays middle-boxes (chicken-egg), U-DCCP in
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-amend-tsvwg-dccp-udp-header-conversion/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-amend-tsvwg-dccp-udp-header-conversion/>
> 
> specifies a lossless and overhead free DCCP to UDP conversion, which is more efficient than traditional encapsulation solutions.

wouldn't the planned multipath support for QUIC address this use case?

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email