Re: [tsvwg] WGLC comments onn DS IEEE 802.11 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11).

["Tim Szigeti (szigeti)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Gorry,

All changes suggested below have been incorporated in the latest version (5) of this PS.

Thank you again for your feedback and guidance.

-tim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tsvwg [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of G Fairhurst
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 11:02 AM
> To: tsvwg WG
> Subject: [tsvwg] WGLC comments onn DS IEEE 802.11 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-
> 802-11).
> 
> *
> I have read the ID during the second WGLC and I think this address all the
> things I commented upon in the previous version.
> 
> I have a few LC comments on the latest text:
> 
> (1) TEXT:
> However, by default, packets marked DSCP CS6 will be mapped to UP 6 and
> serviced within the Voice Access Category (AC_VO); such mapping and
> servicing is a contradiction...
> - I think it is not completely clear what "by default" means, that is whether
> the text is the recommended default from this spec or some other
> recommendation. Could you tweak the words to clarify this - so that it is clear
> it is the latter?
> 
> (2)
> In section 1.6, definition of DSCP. For the avoidance of doubt, I think it
> probably is worth noting "The 6-bit DSCP field is carried in a byte of the IP
> header together with the 2-bit Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) field."
> - This may help alert people that the bit manipulation describes also has to
> preserve the ECN field.
> 
> (3) Further NiT:
> - Please define /GSMA/.
> 
> (4) I suspect the security section may benefit from a better definition of the
> case where the 802.11 network forms the edge of a DS domain. I suspect
> other people will suggest text on this.
> 
> Gorry
> 
> 
> -------*