[tsvwg] WGLC comments onn DS IEEE 802.11 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11).

G Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Thu, 13 July 2017 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE0D12ECB4 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7yfSt7YE2fkF for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:241:204::f0f0]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A250C127076 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 11:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MacBook-2.local (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA4221B0E79C for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Jul 2017 20:55:16 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <5967B58F.1090900@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 19:01:51 +0100
From: G Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tsvwg WG <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/Uy9Zj6C_NavZ6DmI4jqHSxuuIrA>
Subject: [tsvwg] WGLC comments onn DS IEEE 802.11 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-ieee-802-11).
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 18:01:23 -0000

*
I have read the ID during the second WGLC and I think this address all 
the things I commented upon in the previous version.

I have a few LC comments on the latest text:

(1) TEXT:
However, by default, packets marked DSCP CS6 will be mapped to UP 6
and serviced within the Voice Access Category (AC_VO); such mapping
and servicing is a contradiction…
- I think it is not completely clear what “by default” means, that is 
whether the text is the recommended default from this spec or some other 
recommendation. Could you tweak the words to clarify this - so that it 
is clear it is the latter?

(2)
In section 1.6, definition of DSCP. For the avoidance of doubt, I think 
it probably is worth noting “The 6-bit DSCP field is carried in a byte 
of the IP header together with the 2-bit Explicit Congestion 
Notification (ECN) field.”
- This may help alert people that the bit manipulation describes also 
has to preserve the ECN field.

(3) Further NiT:
- Please define /GSMA/.

(4) I suspect the security section may benefit from a better definition 
of the case where the 802.11 network forms the edge of a DS domain. I 
suspect other people will suggest text on this.

Gorry


———————*