[tsvwg] Re: draft-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp-10 ietf last call Opsdir review

"touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com> Tue, 02 September 2025 02:50 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: tsvwg@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE355BE8861; Mon, 1 Sep 2025 19:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.238
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.238 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ben6glaoBr0; Mon, 1 Sep 2025 19:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 934F85BE885B; Mon, 1 Sep 2025 19:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ssIW6qdL6lG7/Ubt5oj2Ve9hFOiqxe+QBS1MCx4QLoI=; b=SF0+rQrjouBJPsvDCsvr3o0Ff+ 7KK02vipYKbGZ07+YppDZvlWl0p414FMCRI8xlYWXTA5e958+05YZwE1dJ7GFghgXPSzzLrWcUFRk h/vzkezKRC/XQHOowsVO+9+oKpnX/v6lTIoAB7cpsN2YijQ7joOlDaECP8kNd7TfRhX/rhIqI6tIf fOFsuQcwK6f9boLfJY3INjtBznHdb2a/5hd9YkknhFGUZwvmzDTlU5czp9eUHJ/QqcLz45c3WquqU RVOzPCfD09631qgyqqKkgWdIAxya8Z46CIYxvuxkxvErwXOW5igdHgk28mXIC3L4sI8Rny96Y8JUD NB+rx83A==;
Received: from [172.56.54.165] (port=11372 helo=smtpclient.apple) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1utH6U-0000000Bi6O-0RTH; Mon, 01 Sep 2025 22:50:38 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F2EABB33-D77A-405A-BEF2-CB39C4E3E809"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.700.81\))
From: "touch@strayalpha.com" <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <175434365952.1011359.2528502233617704826@dt-datatracker-5bd446d5fd-c47nq>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2025 19:50:24 -0700
Message-Id: <8DE53F56-A19D-4FF4-A940-9288832E3616@strayalpha.com>
References: <175434365952.1011359.2528502233617704826@dt-datatracker-5bd446d5fd-c47nq>
To: Niclas Comstedt <nco@comstedt.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.700.81)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1utH6U-0000000Bi6O-0RTH
Message-ID-Hash: 2VJZ5TFH4MNIYDKVEV6UMOZFULYFVUNT
X-Message-ID-Hash: 2VJZ5TFH4MNIYDKVEV6UMOZFULYFVUNT
X-MailFrom: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tsvwg.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: ops-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [tsvwg] Re: draft-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp-10 ietf last call Opsdir review
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/aH2xZPn8Kem3eZ1BDu0_AoynryM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tsvwg-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tsvwg-leave@ietf.org>

Hi, Niclas,

Thank you for your review.

Some notes below, which will be rolled into v12 to be issued later today.

Joe

> On Aug 4, 2025, at 2:40 PM, Niclas Comstedt via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp
> Title: User Ports for Experiments
> Reviewer: Niclas Comstedt
> Review result: Has Nits
> 
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the Ops area directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Ops area directors.
> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
> last-call comments.
> 
> Summary: The objective and rational along with the proposed solution of 
> establishing user space ports for experiments make sense. My only slight
> concern or nits is around the registration language and longevity of this.
> Specifically I find the language in section 4 to be a little less clear than
> ideal around registration encouragement (e.g. the phrasing in first paragraph
> mixing the "bar of registration" with that of encouraging registration which
> comes again later in section 4).

That will be emphasized and clarified.

> And while I don't think it takes away from
> the reason for this I do wonder how experiments move from this to permanent
> solutions (where applicable), i.e. the lack of mentioning it and/or 
> encouraging registering for permanent ports (which I assume is the path).

Yes, that will be added as well.

> 
> Regards,
>    Niclas
> 
>