[tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC8085 (7106)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 22 September 2022 17:47 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B28C14F733; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.659
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.659 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fwKqEBcC7jwb; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BE33C14F607; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:47:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 9EA2055D46; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
To: adam.w@sasktel.net, lars@netapp.com, gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk, gjshep@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: martin.h.duke@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, tsvwg@ietf.org, iana@iana.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220922174659.9EA2055D46@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:46:59 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/bOMQqfe6iwK78kQj0wZnoej6byw>
Subject: [tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC8085 (7106)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:47:03 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC8085, "UDP Usage Guidelines". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7106 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: Adam Wall <adam.w@sasktel.net> Date Reported: 2022-08-31 Verified by: Martin Duke (IESG) Section: 3.4 Original Text ------------- More description of the set of checks performed using the checksum field is provided in Section 3.1 of [RFC6396]. Corrected Text -------------- More description of the set of checks performed using the checksum field is provided in Section 3.1 of [RFC6936]. Notes ----- The wrong RFC was referenced under "Checksum Guidelines" Section 3.4, including the same wrong RFC information within the "Informative References" Section 8.2. -------------------------------------- RFC8085 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-19) -------------------------------------- Title : UDP Usage Guidelines Publication Date : March 2017 Author(s) : L. Eggert, G. Fairhurst, G. Shepherd Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE Source : Transport Area Working Group Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [tsvwg] [Errata Verified] RFC8085 (7106) RFC Errata System