IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8085 (7106)

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Thu, 22 September 2022 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70595C1524A6 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:48:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m-P4tFFgmD7R for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:48:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf31.google.com (mail-qv1-xf31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 052ADC1522D6 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf31.google.com with SMTP id l14so7345855qvq.8 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=+Rlku/H6zYzeXwd/8K6jDSSQQbbHEM43yvBU8vG9poo=; b=k21cwtR0NeD4tnh6540zjqzRFKcxyFwa7iYEetBSR/V79AUFUBNDyl5vI395hvE3E7 OfhkyD7VTxF9oosnHk4A1G5lV+gkDEWxuLvqnSwdXfaOIEBIuaMXQ9ZubJXImbg6Blbb EilujlAenlMoHqzI1u5WGfE4jQ69eefJsESnyA6wlIun4EUosRbUH/b/7E/am3yaOnLa 2HFXt8nDJEeVbdGvDcoojWgnAItOvt4btnN+8kOsxbBNWE5sfmYm9e2kmsPx9RXbqnIo cdjX1+Y0Xp9eVh/8p+4poLUI0Uhn8W5jXhJ8mLSPVInZYW4D51nHbgQjp9VfL/azmjKl /bng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=+Rlku/H6zYzeXwd/8K6jDSSQQbbHEM43yvBU8vG9poo=; b=wLbMvpOAh66Q3lQsAx2R+Kqz9PeuLaZBxQtN21baXaFWTIycBE+dERgFrcYF9SS2CV 8vd//QVBetYsz3qSj+r9+a4JKAnSV6ALDHsQuTfhpGFIRwpKYH53eh0rPRg58+bAd7m3 9qrHbdV2EJ7AmtAnvJH7a2iedTiZRsBhlmxUByXHO3+A4MCnjv0z//71nSSWMrGLrVDJ 2dKxPBucaBXobxT2QO5t3DpK9surhkoXUqKs2XhMUAal9XfPBLhP2vukY+/o2m1HMEGe rlJ20lg9RWzeDgtl8FjkHz7HIl4/Ukj5aXbTYsBztE+WxZ/lPXeSgBBnWr9Cbm4AwX8P XD/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1kG/hzin2R5dCFEh64IOlf5HH8CtxzSB1Xlpo3Uonmt/Xw3y+/ 8stsbsdEz7vL1YX9Ehs29S4hIVyKUHMg0IJb5nw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4p02lmIzIfn+lRhruO6m1oIBB1zEEqsVTO7PxY39FumN/fcANq2fmo4R5SqKdW/6lzRTaBbA6rkYLhMJpgflI=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:27e9:b0:4aa:9ff0:e8de with SMTP id jt9-20020a05621427e900b004aa9ff0e8demr3543476qvb.99.1663868847787; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:47:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220831094606.86C2E961F3@rfcpa.amsl.com> <537FC516-BFFC-487D-991E-B95A422E5A3F@eggert.org> <63483a4f-5280-c043-2138-1bccd77a88f9@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <63483a4f-5280-c043-2138-1bccd77a88f9@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:47:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxRsEpcECmb+FE_bh60CZEfS3RLgG_Oqh-Nh1DdcKJGHLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, adam.w@sasktel.net, gjshep@gmail.com, tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a0121e05e947a733"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/HvbEnF6yKjRJxT75MUkzTWPSwvg>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8085 (7106)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 17:48:24 -0000

thank you to the commenters, i've verified it.

On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 6:20 AM Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
wrote:

> I agree, this reference needs to be corrected.
>
> best wishes,
> Gorry
>
> On 31/08/2022 10:54, Lars Eggert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > IMO this errata is correct and should be verified.
> >
> > Additionally, the reference in the "Informative References" section
> should also be changed, per the notes.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Lars
> >
> > On 2022-8-31, at 12:46, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> wrote:
> >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links
> or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8085,
> >> "UDP Usage Guidelines".
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> You may review the report below and at:
> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7106
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> Type: Editorial
> >> Reported by: Adam Wall <adam.w@sasktel.net>
> >>
> >> Section: 3.4
> >>
> >> Original Text
> >> -------------
> >> More description of the set of checks performed using the checksum
> field is provided in Section 3.1 of [RFC6396].
> >>
> >> Corrected Text
> >> --------------
> >> More description of the set of checks performed using the checksum
> field is provided in Section 3.1 of [RFC6936].
> >>
> >> Notes
> >> -----
> >> The wrong RFC was referenced under "Checksum Guidelines" Section 3.4,
> including the same wrong RFC information within the "Informative
> References" Section 8.2.
> >>
> >> Instructions:
> >> -------------
> >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> RFC8085 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-19)
> >> --------------------------------------
> >> Title               : UDP Usage Guidelines
> >> Publication Date    : March 2017
> >> Author(s)           : L. Eggert, G. Fairhurst, G. Shepherd
> >> Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
> >> Source              : Transport Area Working Group
> >> Area                : Transport
> >> Stream              : IETF
> >> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email