Re: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8085 (7106)
Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Wed, 31 August 2022 13:20 UTC
Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311BBC14CE2E for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 06:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.908
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.908 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g8-IhqdHhD6u for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 06:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD2BC14CF0A for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 06:20:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPV6:2001:630:42:110:d5bd:73e9:99c:b4a] (unknown [IPv6:2001:630:42:110:d5bd:73e9:99c:b4a]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 936761B0022C; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:19:57 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <63483a4f-5280-c043-2138-1bccd77a88f9@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 14:19:54 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: adam.w@sasktel.net, gjshep@gmail.com, tsvwg@ietf.org
References: <20220831094606.86C2E961F3@rfcpa.amsl.com> <537FC516-BFFC-487D-991E-B95A422E5A3F@eggert.org>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <537FC516-BFFC-487D-991E-B95A422E5A3F@eggert.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/AgxIoSxcv7FwFx3jQMtExcBETWk>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8085 (7106)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:20:12 -0000
I agree, this reference needs to be corrected. best wishes, Gorry On 31/08/2022 10:54, Lars Eggert wrote: > Hi, > > IMO this errata is correct and should be verified. > > Additionally, the reference in the "Informative References" section should also be changed, per the notes. > > Thanks, > Lars > > On 2022-8-31, at 12:46, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: >> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> >> >> >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8085, >> "UDP Usage Guidelines". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7106 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Editorial >> Reported by: Adam Wall <adam.w@sasktel.net> >> >> Section: 3.4 >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> More description of the set of checks performed using the checksum field is provided in Section 3.1 of [RFC6396]. >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> More description of the set of checks performed using the checksum field is provided in Section 3.1 of [RFC6936]. >> >> Notes >> ----- >> The wrong RFC was referenced under "Checksum Guidelines" Section 3.4, including the same wrong RFC information within the "Informative References" Section 8.2. >> >> Instructions: >> ------------- >> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party >> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >> >> -------------------------------------- >> RFC8085 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-19) >> -------------------------------------- >> Title : UDP Usage Guidelines >> Publication Date : March 2017 >> Author(s) : L. Eggert, G. Fairhurst, G. Shepherd >> Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE >> Source : Transport Area Working Group >> Area : Transport >> Stream : IETF >> Verifying Party : IESG
- [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8085 (7106) RFC Errata System
- Re: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8085 (… Lars Eggert
- Re: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8085 (… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8085 (… Martin Duke