IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8085 (7106)

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Wed, 31 August 2022 09:54 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAC6C14F744 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 02:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ynwlZf8lWufd for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 02:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A136C14F73D for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 02:54:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:88b9:4484:f7ad:88ee]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FDC81DC617; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:54:38 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1661939678; bh=xP/DV3Z6X0b39KSh0JEPseN48InApxgjdoYNsA5GoIY=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Sp2pJ9r1/ZIr9DK+JyEnGd4rOX+wl84PjnIQj2+nyk9iKXq/BElx0o7E0YoYbfWFk CRsxYK3c3nF2vgMXgF3kvs63FpfJGOt8y/Ik56Y0s4kGhEU8RmvtTToztOk+wo9R5T HJL6NZvHd8zDO5r1bM8JcWraLT39Bud2tzwoye6I=
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BA54D844-447B-4929-9D9A-E253A76ED05A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <20220831094606.86C2E961F3@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 12:54:27 +0300
Cc: adam.w@sasktel.net, Gorry Fairhust <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, gjshep@gmail.com, tsvwg@ietf.org
Message-Id: <537FC516-BFFC-487D-991E-B95A422E5A3F@eggert.org>
References: <20220831094606.86C2E961F3@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-MailScanner-ID: 6FDC81DC617.A6BD3
X-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/y6CS9N5kcF3Zh3n26b8jQ-YAqHg>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8085 (7106)
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 09:54:52 -0000

Hi,

IMO this errata is correct and should be verified.

Additionally, the reference in the "Informative References" section should also be changed, per the notes.

Thanks,
Lars

On 2022-8-31, at 12:46, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8085,
> "UDP Usage Guidelines".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7106
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Adam Wall <adam.w@sasktel.net>
> 
> Section: 3.4
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> More description of the set of checks performed using the checksum field is provided in Section 3.1 of [RFC6396].
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> More description of the set of checks performed using the checksum field is provided in Section 3.1 of [RFC6936].
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The wrong RFC was referenced under "Checksum Guidelines" Section 3.4, including the same wrong RFC information within the "Informative References" Section 8.2.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8085 (draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-19)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : UDP Usage Guidelines
> Publication Date    : March 2017
> Author(s)           : L. Eggert, G. Fairhurst, G. Shepherd
> Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
> Source              : Transport Area Working Group
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email