[tsvwg] Some references to work concerning draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-19

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Thu, 16 February 2023 08:41 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A531C14CE53 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:41:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6_QXmWyMR3qB for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:41:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DE1C14F720 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:41:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 990AF1B0007D; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:41:21 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <17a13961-1627-c60b-5a4f-d8e8fdb38bd0@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:41:20 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.2
To: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <167599146728.42049.10916891372133731811@ietfa.amsl.com> <BB7783E3-273A-4D83-B4BF-BCE3DA00E609@strayalpha.com> <CALx6S36QovfwXjFmspVP4CgEOwmJzBLGX59c=zsvSGap8sX1gQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VFDQUjp5ez70RpyptZSOYvso2-QZsRvLhRNyU9p0iMayw@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S34y6XttaEz_Uod4bSK50F-KArrv-V=HjKAb8v-9oWoM5Q@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VGKuk2HU1Hy4bZymUgPJqvhtzS_xSvZ987m58=fZAAXDw@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S34dEdPgUvTQZda0qb-H3dERzo-3rjsnZ1MyscbJwJwvoQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VEhA-Jc_GH2isrJjYsheEp0phHdh71ZgRnvBW5tCKYR5A@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S3551sms4q_yKh8QYqeedB3uoK9ZRMNrDtVLoMxe-ENX5g@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VFFoX93feS-Q8XTy6rDf6Xa6vwnCB75swohp-bPqrxdEA@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S37MNYft1bMUsEcuUj9iobtX7dTF-o+N1vShTQ7yARVDwQ@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VEhYk=QX972yYZ2Ryt50G20dZT-Jc3SL9BmwQEMJ8H7-A@mail.gmail.com> <CALx6S34G9b0Miyr5haBMZ9TaxNSArbg_8NboSKX0hbXqonzCaA@mail.gmail.com> <CACL_3VEZGj_p2-igp9JJixc8C-62MW-r4HYqMQYVChY=gKx7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Organization: UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN
In-Reply-To: <CACL_3VEZGj_p2-igp9JJixc8C-62MW-r4HYqMQYVChY=gKx7pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/blT6ivGZBE_OZLhWssrBYVZwiBg>
Subject: [tsvwg] Some references to work concerning draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-19
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:41:38 -0000

[1] Overcoming the Sorrows of the Young UDP Options
Raffaele Zullo, Tom Jones, Gorry Fairhurst, TMA, June 2020.
https://tma.ifip.org/2020/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2020/06/tma2020-camera-paper70.pdf

[2] Implementation of the Internet Checksum
Tom Herbert, TSVWG proceedings IETF113
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/slides-113-tsvwg-71-checksum-offload-00

[3] Datagram PLPMTUD for UDP Options, TSVWG proceedings IETF109.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/slides-109-tsvwg-sessa-52-tom-jones-dplpmtud-for-udp-options-00

======


[1] evaluates how implementations calculate the UDP checksum and 
demonstrate a range of schemes that result in a range of pathologies, 
and reduce the expected success for deployment, showing how an 
additional checksum can overcome obstacles to deployment of UDP Options.

[2] Checksum offload and UDP Options.

[3] Exploratory work implemented in FreeBSD using UDP Options for 
DPLPMTUD, 2020.