Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-19
Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Thu, 16 February 2023 08:41 UTC
Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8834EC14CF0D for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:41:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MDvC-eSiwWEz for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:41:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:42:150::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69088C14F720 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:41:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.64] (fgrpf.plus.com [212.159.18.54]) by pegasus.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D8E01B0007D; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:41:10 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <bd71095c-e24c-f3af-9107-3546d08b9bf9@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:41:09 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.2
To: touch@strayalpha.com
Cc: tsvwg <tsvwg@ietf.org>
References: <FBA0A6A2-3FF7-480A-AA94-F5C1CF85881C@csperkins.org> <738B270A-8C69-4D88-90B4-E2DD999E61F3@strayalpha.com> <AB6CF830-10A6-4080-B56D-C33D73D4586D@csperkins.org>
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Organization: UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN
In-Reply-To: <AB6CF830-10A6-4080-B56D-C33D73D4586D@csperkins.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/ssczuf48LsMiKIh11kJPhMB9fmo>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-19
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 08:41:19 -0000
On 15/02/2023 22:06, Colin Perkins wrote: > Section 16: are there references to measurement studies to support the > claims in this section? The analysis is appropriate for an > experimental protocol, where the goals of the experiment include > understanding interactions with legacy devices, but seems weak for a > proposed standard. Here are a couple of suggestions: [1] Overcoming the Sorrows of the Young UDP Options Raffaele Zullo, Tom Jones, Gorry Fairhurst, TMA, June 2020. https://tma.ifip.org/2020/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2020/06/tma2020-camera-paper70.pdf [2] Datagram PLPMTUD for UDP Options, TSVWG proceedings IETF109. https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/materials/slides-109-tsvwg-sessa-52-tom-jones-dplpmtud-for-udp-options-00 ====== [1] There were various results from Eaffaele, but I'd suggest we cite this - it evaluates how implementations calculate the UDP checksum and demonstrate a range of schemes that result in a range of pathologies, and reduce the expected success for deployment, showing how an additional checksum can overcome obstacles to deployment of UDP Options. [2] This was one of a series of talks on exploratory work implemented in FreeBSD using UDP Options for DPLPMTUD, 2020. You could also see if any of the material seems relevant in "Implementation of the Internet Checksum" Tom Herbert, TSVWG proceedings IETF113 https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/slides-113-tsvwg-71-checksum-offload-00 Best wishes, Gorry
- [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-19 Colin Perkins
- Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-option… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-option… C. M. Heard
- Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-option… Colin Perkins
- Re: [tsvwg] Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-option… Gorry Fairhurst