IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tsvwg] [Bloat] [Ecn-sane] [iccrg] Fwd: [tcpPrague] Implementation and experimentation of TCP Prague/L4S hackaton at IETF104

"Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com> Wed, 20 March 2019 20:09 UTC

Return-Path: <jholland@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1601C1311BF for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.85, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rdQQYNo-gXSN for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC2331311E7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2KK6sma013806; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:08:13 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=sKNEege9zAB1CUhYWugyrGwMjqrhWY5XEjFETdWRlwk=; b=gRkNjiCclQAoEam3WcP6RtDTqUyg0/GTzPmcJARBy94dd5FTRWhvDCuD2iZYAvxUZ6LS H3JU4zSCOYA0MxjEHCmgW3Id5na5RBm4+GZ7Ql9urOrm1PvN9LKCVGRKTW0lT0JaGgQq FoLpEnahH01Qfx9lirZCcd+YSgiSi/wNVt+z6do7aQTb/Wnwkb+oXRKT+D2c1piUQNfB jXma4H3+Xxjg3/TGnDIWFm4k403HVB/S0BGkE72qdFmZB6iBBkRsc/iLblCBYLqqxMkv aXKVWJvNcGLbZslsyrrVQvEnE2qt8/2IpAsHHFjByJ61FKxhyerRuWkcvjUnAQu5+dfd Dw==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (a96-6-114-86.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [96.6.114.86] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2rbqp4h54x-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:08:13 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2KK2IvV008829; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:08:12 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.25.34]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2r8vfysm6j-7 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:08:09 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.104) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.27.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:05:10 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.134]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.6.134]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.003; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:05:10 -0500
From: "Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
CC: Bob Briscoe <ietf@bobbriscoe.net>, "David P. Reed" <dpreed@deepplum.com>, Vint Cerf <vint@google.com>, tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Thread-Topic: [Bloat] [Ecn-sane] [iccrg] Fwd: [tcpPrague] Implementation and experimentation of TCP Prague/L4S hackaton at IETF104
Thread-Index: AQHU3fAStLNlmEqR40GN89nPTDogPqYUwgYAgACEdgD//4yMgA==
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:05:09 +0000
Message-ID: <70A6F663-751D-45D2-80A8-471E51788D96@akamai.com>
References: <d91a6a71-5898-9571-2a02-0d9d83839615@bobbriscoe.net> <CAA93jw5MTdn9EQgpZ0xrjqEi7UKqH3H_741anoB+pa0dtD=fpA@mail.gmail.com> <1E80578D-A589-4CA0-9015-B03B63042355@gmx.de> <CAA93jw7jvjbZkEgO8xc03uCayo+o-uENxxAkzQOaz_EZSLhocw@mail.gmail.com> <27FA673A-2C4C-4652-943F-33FAA1CF1E83@gmx.de> <1552669283.555112988@apps.rackspace.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903151915320.3161@uplift.swm.pp.se> <7029DA80-8B83-4775-8261-A4ADD2CF34C7@akamai.com> <CAHxHggfPCqf9biCDmHMqA38=4y6gY6pFtRVMjMrrzYfLyRBf-g@mail.gmail.com> <1552846034.909628287@apps.rackspace.com> <5458c216-07b9-5b06-a381-326de49b53e0@bobbriscoe.net> <AC14ACBB-A7CC-40E0-882C-2519D05ADC05@akamai.com> <20190320125822.0fe3c513@shemminger-XPS-13-9360>
In-Reply-To: <20190320125822.0fe3c513@shemminger-XPS-13-9360>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.17.0.190309
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.112.203]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <E49232E547D433408DF1A0C96A55A9C2@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-03-20_12:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=980 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903200145
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-03-20_12:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903200146
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/dobqlZkYkJyFkrLIX8dcSdlVaKI>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] [Bloat] [Ecn-sane] [iccrg] Fwd: [tcpPrague] Implementation and experimentation of TCP Prague/L4S hackaton at IETF104
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:09:07 -0000

On 2019-03-20, 12:58, "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
    Has anyone done a detailed investigation for prior art?

I don't know, but for serendipitous reasons I recently came across this,
which may be interesting to those who would be interested in digging
further on that question:

http://www.statslab.cam.ac.uk/~frank/PAPERS/tac.pdf
"On packet marking at priority queues"
R. J. Gibbens and F. P. Kelly
IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 47 (2002) 1016-1020.

I wasn't sure if it was technically prior art or not, and I'm offering
no opinion, but it sounded similar to me in some significant ways.

HTH.

-Jake

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email