Re: [Tsvwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-2960bis-02 starts NOW

[Randall Stewart <[e-mail]>]

Magnus:

How about if we add to the intro:
"
<section anchor="1.7" title="Changes from RFC2960">
<t>
SCTP was originally defined in <xref target="RFC2960"></xref> which
this document replaces. Readers interested in the details of the
various changes that this document incorporates are asked to
consult <xref target="RFC4460"></xref>.
</t>
</section>
"

???

R


Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> Randall Stewart skrev:
> 
>> Dan:
>>
>> A couple of thoughts here..
>>
>>
>> Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>>
>>> 1. I believe that the document could benefit from a section describing
>>> the changes relative to RFC 2960.
>>
>>
>> The changes are documented in RFC4460.. this is what the whole
>> point of the document was.. a living history of why we changed
>> what we changed in the BIS document. I would not like to see
>> the protocol document cluttered with this.. since the new RFC
>> will replace 2960... just like 793 replaced the previous TCP
>> document (can't remember the number off the top of my head :-o)
>>
>>
> 
> I think the reasonable thing here is to include a "Changes compared to 
> RFC 2960" section that simply contains a reference to RFC 4460. That way 
> people can look it up.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Magnus Westerlund
> 
> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVA/A
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Ericsson AB                | Phone [phone]
> Torshamsgatan 23           | Fax   [phone]
> S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [e-mail]
> 
> 


-- 
Randall Stewart
803-345-0369 <or> 815-342-5222(cell)