Re: [Tsvwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-tsvwg-2960bis-02 starts NOW

[Michael Tuexen <[e-mail]>]

Hi Randy,

please take into account that RFC 4460 describes the the changes
between RFC 2960 and RFC 3309 on the one hand and the RFC2960bis
on the other hand.

Best regards
Michael

On Oct 31, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Randall Stewart wrote:

> Magnus:
>
> How about if we add to the intro:
> "
> <section anchor="1.7" title="Changes from RFC2960">
> <t>
> SCTP was originally defined in <xref target="RFC2960"></xref> which
> this document replaces. Readers interested in the details of the
> various changes that this document incorporates are asked to
> consult <xref target="RFC4460"></xref>.
> </t>
> </section>
> "
>
> ???
>
> R
>
>
> Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>> Randall Stewart skrev:
>>> Dan:
>>>
>>> A couple of thoughts here..
>>>
>>>
>>> Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>>>
>>>> 1. I believe that the document could benefit from a section  
>>>> describing
>>>> the changes relative to RFC 2960.
>>>
>>>
>>> The changes are documented in RFC4460.. this is what the whole
>>> point of the document was.. a living history of why we changed
>>> what we changed in the BIS document. I would not like to see
>>> the protocol document cluttered with this.. since the new RFC
>>> will replace 2960... just like 793 replaced the previous TCP
>>> document (can't remember the number off the top of my head :-o)
>>>
>>>
>> I think the reasonable thing here is to include a "Changes  
>> compared to RFC 2960" section that simply contains a reference to  
>> RFC 4460. That way people can look it up.
>> Cheers
>> Magnus Westerlund
>> Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVA/A
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> -
>> Ericsson AB                | Phone [phone]
>> Torshamsgatan 23           | Fax   [phone]
>> S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: [e-mail]
>
>
> -- 
> Randall Stewart
> 803-345-0369 <or> 815-342-5222(cell)
>
>