[Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: Robust ECN Signaling with Nonces to Experimental

Mark Allman <mallman@grc.nasa.gov> Thu, 12 December 2002 04:03 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA02486 for <tsvwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:03:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id gBC464M10508 for tsvwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:06:04 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBC45ev10477; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:05:40 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBC44lv10438 for <tsvwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:04:47 -0500
Received: from pop-2.dnv.wideopenwest.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA02468; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:01:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from thoth.ir.bbn.com (d53-203-209.clv.wideopenwest.com [64.53.209.203]) by pop-2.dnv.wideopenwest.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBC40p222397; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 22:00:53 -0600
Received: from thoth.ir.bbn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thoth.ir.bbn.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBC46mJg002728; Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:06:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mallman@thoth.ir.bbn.com)
Message-Id: <200212120406.gBC46mJg002728@thoth.ir.bbn.com>
To: iesg@ietf.org
Cc: tsvwg@ietf.org, nspring@cs.washington.edu, djw@cs.washington.edu, ely@cs.washington.edu, Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>, Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@grc.nasa.gov>
Reply-To: mallman@grc.nasa.gov
Organization: BBN Technologies/NASA GRC
Song-of-the-Day: Old Man Down the Road
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 23:06:48 -0500
Subject: [Tsvwg] Re: Last Call: Robust ECN Signaling with Nonces to Experimental
Sender: tsvwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

 
Folks-

I asked a couple of questions about why this document is slated for
experimental earlier today.  After some useful discussion I was
asked to state my opinion on this matter in public (for the record
and for others to shoot at, I presume).

> The IESG has received a request from the Transport Area Working
> Group Working Group to consider Robust ECN Signaling with Nonces
> <draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-nonce-04.txt> as an Experimental Protocol.

I think this document should go forward as a proposed standard
rather than experimental.

I see the role of experimental as for things that we are just not
sure about.  The recent byte-counting I-D is a good example.  From
everything we know about it, consensus seems to be that it should be
OK.  But, it seems to me that the change is non-trivial enough and
the direction of the questions are in the behavior of TCP in shared
networks and what sorts of effects the change will have on traffic
patterns.  So, going through a period of experimental status seems
fine and prudent to me.

But, it seems to me that the ECN nonce is pretty straightforward.  I
have good confidence that it will not fail in ways that are unsafe
to the global network.  Of course, there is always the possibility
of unforeseen interactions, but my own opinion is that the nonce is
ready for proposed standard (which is not a full standard and we can
still tweak things later).

allman


--
Mark Allman -- BBN/NASA GRC -- http://roland.grc.nasa.gov/~mallman/
_______________________________________________
tsvwg mailing list
tsvwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg