Re: [tsvwg] ECT(1) Flag Day Plausibility

"Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com> Fri, 14 May 2021 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jholland@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9353A41DF for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.698, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LIIPuyr6D1I5 for <tsvwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6803F3A41C7 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 15:05:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122333.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 14EM121d030568; Fri, 14 May 2021 23:05:11 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=nfviLTVmx12obCArKlg/Z7iSvIcWt39DFTBKBBMXRK4=; b=OBWaFWuB9YNSt9pw2K2FVEGy+1YIFx87Stdx7u57UyNCF6b/Ev4a5dNtbY5mRgvRcSwW u2R6XOnqK6fiQpvRDi3A7IBHiXwMPQcv5uF3RMTgsGE6jc7rV8IboVWRasK15NAmWBWV lKO3eilAfVANetTfXIJ82vLjkXyXdPCudYMPzukW8rVL+seYrK91o0IurlB1YrVMj+mI ebdoUJTcT/JXthf0nAx8N760f0oZpMPij7O190UxbwENASURdKDP/107AlQT4BRiOk4E TkbrpOmtA6zCeOG2YFQBoApNfY4zUZQFb7E8pp+Dyl1J6D6Uf2zIJwbwifrqPZooNl0k dQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (a72-247-45-34.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.34] (may be forged)) by mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 38hf4weyb2-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 14 May 2021 23:05:10 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 14EM3cdU017539; Fri, 14 May 2021 18:05:09 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.113]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com with ESMTP id 38gpmw3uef-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 14 May 2021 18:05:09 -0400
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.122) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 14 May 2021 17:05:08 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.122]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.122]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.012; Fri, 14 May 2021 17:05:08 -0500
From: "Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>
To: "Bless, Roland (TM)" <roland.bless@kit.edu>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tsvwg] ECT(1) Flag Day Plausibility
Thread-Index: AQHXRINbQXqIJhM9Gk6mb/oPRBc6karjReqAgAAp7QA=
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 22:05:08 +0000
Message-ID: <ED50617B-D11E-4390-9073-B2BA84061DE8@akamai.com>
References: <1284557F-E91A-4997-A148-63179F6208A3@akamai.com> <7c8b66c3-597c-42ed-eea5-f852a8c61853@kit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <7c8b66c3-597c-42ed-eea5-f852a8c61853@kit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.48.21041102
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <FFE0366F6086274FBBAD86CCAC86E2E5@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-14_11:2021-05-12, 2021-05-14 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105140171
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: nQH4ukrlakxQuDi3uekHNeDgvYNH7z3k
X-Proofpoint-GUID: nQH4ukrlakxQuDi3uekHNeDgvYNH7z3k
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.761 definitions=2021-05-14_11:2021-05-12, 2021-05-14 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 mlxscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2104190000 definitions=main-2105140171
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 72.247.45.34) smtp.mailfrom=jholland@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/lWUdVkLhorJo9J8bDrBocH_HPow>
Subject: Re: [tsvwg] ECT(1) Flag Day Plausibility
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tsvwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 22:05:17 -0000

Hi Roland,

On 05-14, 5:35 AM, "Bless, Roland (TM)" <roland.bless@kit.edu> wrote:
> I find it somewhat odd to deprecate/revise a Proposed Standard in order 
> to rollout an Experiment.

RFC 8311 also did this, I don't see this idea as especially different
on this point.  I mean sure, maybe it's odd, but sometimes the right
thing to do can be odd.

From the poll at the interim, there seems to be significant support in
the WG for moving this ahead regardless of the conflicts with existing
BCPs, which is about what I expected based on past discussions.  The
flag day proposal is just trying to look into one of the possibilities
for making that align better.

> Moreover, where can I find statistics about ECN usage along Internet 
> paths? I'm aware of 
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-heist-tsvwg-ecn-deployment-observations-02.html, 
> but are there others?

I did a presentation last year sharing a few observations I made:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1326B7YYwLM&t=4338s
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2020-maprg-01/materials/slides-interim-2020-maprg-01-sessa-latency-aqm-observations-on-the-internet-01.pdf

Those slides reference another presentation with some other numbers
collected differently:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKDgVSMUvis&t=32m23s
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/98/slides/slides-98-maprg-tcp-ecn-experience-with-enabling-ecn-on-the-internet-padma-bhooma-00#page=12

Outside Pete's writeup that's all I've seen published yet.

> I'd expect many home routers to be the bottleneck, so their potential
> CE marks wouldn't be visible in the Internet, but merely the
> corresponding ECE flags in TCP packets.

That's what I did, yes.

Apple's measurements were from agents on the receive side IIUC and
I think they said included upload traffic, which I took to mean they
took both CE and ECE that didn't trigger their heuristics as evidence
of a CE-marking path.

HTH.

Best regards,
Jake