Re: [tsvwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-22.txt

[Gorry Fairhurst <[e-mail]>]

On 14/03/2024 18:06, Greg White wrote:
> All,
>
> A short while ago, I uploaded a new version of the NQB PHB draft.  This version addresses the long list of comments (many editorial, but also a few technical) provided by Bob Briscoe (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsvwg/XPehj4puGc4Yo2EK2NrKfW5FcHI/).
>
> At this point, the authors believe that the document is ready for a second WGLC.
> -Greg

Hi Greg,

Many thanks for doing this, and we'd welcome reviews of the new draft - 
that will certainly help the WG!

We're currently processing the MP-DCCP draft, and looking for an expert 
review to help us know this is ready to proceed.

We're also tracking the progerss UDP Options - which also seems to be 
ready for a WGLC.

I think TSVWG will likely last call UDP Options before NQB.

Besy wishes,

Gorry

>
>
> On 2/16/24, 10:26 AM, "tsvwg on behalf of [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]> on behalf of [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>
>
> Internet-Draft draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-22.txt is now available. It is a work item
> of the Transport and Services Working Group (TSVWG) WG of the IETF.
>
>
> Title: A Non-Queue-Building Per-Hop Behavior (NQB PHB) for Differentiated Services
> Authors: Greg White
> Thomas Fossati
> Rüdiger Geib
> Name: draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-22.txt
> Pages: 34
> Dates: 2024-02-16
>
>
> Abstract:
>
>
> This document specifies characteristics of a Non-Queue-Building Per-
> Hop Behavior (NQB PHB). The NQB PHB provides a shallow-buffered,
> best-effort service as a complement to a Default deep-buffered best-
> effort service for Internet services. The purpose of this NQB PHB is
> to provide a separate queue that enables smooth (i.e. non-bursty),
> low-data-rate, application-limited traffic microflows, which would
> ordinarily share a queue with bursty and capacity-seeking traffic, to
> avoid the latency, latency variation and loss caused by such traffic.
> This PHB is implemented without prioritization and can be implemented
> without rate policing, making it suitable for environments where the
> use of these features is restricted. The NQB PHB has been developed
> primarily for use by access network segments, where queuing delays
> and queuing loss caused by Queue-Building protocols are manifested,
> but its use is not limited to such segments. In particular,
> applications to cable broadband links, Wi-Fi links, and mobile
> network radio and core segments are discussed. This document
> recommends a specific Differentiated Services Code Point (DSCP) to
> identify Non-Queue-Building microflows.
>
>
> [NOTE (to be removed by RFC-Editor): This document references an ISE
> submission draft (I-D.briscoe-docsis-q-protection) that is approved
> for publication as an RFC. This draft should be held for publication
> until the queue protection RFC can be referenced.]
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb/>
>
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-22.html <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-22.html>
>
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-22 <https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-22>
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
>
>
>
>
>