RE: [Tsvwg] RFC 1323 revision

"Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz> Tue, 19 August 2003 18:18 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA27635 for <tsvwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:18:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19pB3V-0002Ab-OO for tsvwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:18:06 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h7JII5GC008314 for tsvwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:18:05 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19pB3R-000299-D8; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:18:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19pB2X-00022T-Am for tsvwg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:17:05 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA27586 for <tsvwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:17:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19pB2U-0004wy-00 for tsvwg@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:17:02 -0400
Received: from cypress.neustar.com ([209.173.57.84]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19pB2T-0004wU-00 for tsvwg@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:17:01 -0400
Received: from stntimc1.va.neustar.com (stntimc1.va.neustar.com [10.31.13.11]) by cypress.neustar.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h7JIGDG11664; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 18:16:14 GMT
Received: by stntimc1.va.neustar.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <Q5CP45XB>; Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:16:14 -0400
Message-ID: <A9DECB0B8A01A54DBECC03B25D29513C0A7B1D@stntexch03.va.neustar.com>
From: "Peterson, Jon" <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
To: 'David Borman' <dab@BSDI.COM>, end2end-interest@postel.org, tsvwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Tsvwg] RFC 1323 revision
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 14:16:26 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: tsvwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: tsvwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tsvwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Transport Area Working Group <tsvwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tsvwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg>, <mailto:tsvwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

I believe that the TSVWG is a reasonable place to discuss this work (at
least until the long-expected TCP WG is formed), and that an IETF WG mailing
list is the right place to manage documents that aspire to become
standards-track RFCs. Of course, pursuing this document in the TSVWG would
not preclude analysis on the venerable e2e list, which of course harbors
numerous non-overlapping experts who could provide valuable input on this
work.

Jon Peterson
NeuStar, Inc.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Borman [mailto:dab@BSDI.COM]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 6:27 AM
> To: end2end-interest@postel.org; tsvwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [Tsvwg] RFC 1323 revision
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> A revision to RFC 1323, TCP Extensions for High Performance, is
> currently being discussed on the tsvwg@ietf.org mailing list.
> Is this the right place for this discussion, or should it move
> over to end2end-interest@postel.org, the End to End mailing list?
> (The TCP Large Windows mailing list is no longer active.)
> 
> 			-David Borman
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tsvwg mailing list
> tsvwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg
> 

_______________________________________________
tsvwg mailing list
tsvwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg