IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Txauth] alignment on Justin's use of "transactional" adjective

Vijay IETF <vijay.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 30 April 2020 20:15 UTC

Return-Path: <vijay.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8204B3A127A for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CHTHhvxcmtvZ for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12a.google.com (mail-il1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90EBE3A127B for <txauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id w6so2640153ilg.1 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ODN2Q4sO6hbYxmcYhrSn4lUDAkb8fo2JjMWJiW+/xC4=; b=naHywjQeAU/NDvM0FOlGO4jeSu31aRB2WTrk9X70Hgd5IZN0t2kV14Bs7kmwcytdWf ETNAFJVCNQIf6vGoVWXZUdXSd1k883x1uLgUmBGwP8QM6ix0qcLSp2zfnYiefVUtBYdW /xaY/Y68Nst73ISUt7xvG7+LEVcClqTINJf6XdHwiMshE2k6E/DDN3lqlPVrgXNab+50 76omy4lE3Gnwk3/CT0Bcj5OSEhQQCX2Zbj2Gkevag8NBXcfNznlX7ZK0iqWdUPeFE+6b FOGUA9q4rji5tiBsdqncSY/Jx8jEyYqS1lGIBbhqDcQay7GcGOm1/mZWJZuV0Jfp4coq GmCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ODN2Q4sO6hbYxmcYhrSn4lUDAkb8fo2JjMWJiW+/xC4=; b=O0odQMknA4M5sK8v8mWQa4rIFxWQPOod45HYJyjPssYj0oKNn4UQ2E70KU/KrXsl6s 9SD4po9JBZ069Ty8kDe3/tnWH4rinTWZz8NYhAllIhO5KXYRveZx7LwJWWQKWFx9ag1G a9/zRxggBT7WXkwXKCWaco2ShUO0X48cnjNPL7cKfX9l9AzT4+llB1q8v8m5f8XjQ7ry pkHakJbsuNt3voSQVLA8xeJVOg/p+BxIHk5COcGcbPXNUwqc0ZC0m6UqjXHErBraEVav oOYpmAdoq+EpXaUZXBfAwkBmcoIXyArStNFIo7filipCXbY8H5Tqa3a+qQtimd0EEFG8 hw5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYKfCusSJ6MiGUuOYUWlYQ6mMW6wYfxQ1ObxgZxrXRMuTY5D43p xTDVlF1Bpi5e3SqNtMU/N9Uscy+jB3EzX0VjXP4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIWCOkPBpTMW9lv8iXRlZoZBbd3r0Fks81RxQBF6yzJA+M+aAcCF065zlj7mQdF9/HxGi4iYgkMhbjvsnSG9XM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:60a:: with SMTP id t10mr120588ils.302.1588277704007; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 13:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM8feuR1ShcH3SkPYcR4+Utd+ZZ7_jnP+Z=3CJ=ZM988cA5ogg@mail.gmail.com> <809DA044-3184-4DE0-A951-8C57A79DD6D6@mit.edu> <CAM8feuQda7_vie1qky+nV7AFkjP0t115LM3m-R_8CF_WNfjWOw@mail.gmail.com> <CAM8feuRCSbRxa_-6E+BjfO5dBwqpdvjXcRcEryQt_820NaDNVQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM8feuRCSbRxa_-6E+BjfO5dBwqpdvjXcRcEryQt_820NaDNVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vijay IETF <vijay.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2020 01:44:52 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEADennBgO6+_KAPsnRSu8A+PTgd41WadqwrXccEmG6HEL_M0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
Cc: Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu>, txauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005a238305a487b81c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/b1ta9XHP-WzEtFMj8mkyOKPiaRg>
Subject: Re: [Txauth] alignment on Justin's use of "transactional" adjective
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:15:10 -0000

Late to the party. Catching up.
+1 for NgAuth (for its new meaning, not for what I suggested earlier)
+1 for IdAuth (gives some clues that Identity is innate to authorization)

+2 for TxAuth (I really don't see why it is so bad. In fact the
"transaction" is what drew me to this group)

Cheers!

On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 at 04:57, Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Maybe :
>
> Transactional -> Negociated
> Tx -> Ng
> TxAuth -> NgAuth (which should also be fine with people that prefered
> "nextgen").
>
>  ?
>
>
> Le jeu. 23 avr. 2020 à 16:54, Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Yes indeed, it would happen.
>> ah... naming things...
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 4:31 PM Justin Richer <jricher@mit.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> I’d be a little of the “N” coming off as “negative” or “not”. As in,
>>> this is “not auth”. :P
>>>
>>>  — Justin
>>>
>>> On Apr 23, 2020, at 10:06 AM, Fabien Imbault <fabien.imbault@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 to NAP proposed by Mike.
>>>
>>> With that I'll rest easy (in software and elsewhere) ;-)
>>>
>>> NAuth would do too (N for negociated)?
>>>
>>> Fabien
>>>
>>> --
>>> Txauth mailing list
>>> Txauth@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>>>
>>>
>>> --
> Txauth mailing list
> Txauth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email