[Txauth] Name Game (contd)
Nigel Hamilton <nige@123.do> Wed, 20 May 2020 05:20 UTC
Return-Path: <nige@123.do>
X-Original-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: txauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13AB3A3A83 for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2020 22:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=123-do.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A0XGh55VTogf for <txauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2020 22:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com (mail-il1-x132.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 698953A11C0 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2020 22:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id c20so1876029ilk.6 for <txauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2020 22:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=123-do.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dHXYuA94PVQpCtLzx2v1P+jvZl1DrBI5lhN9gcVELVw=; b=D43Z6h3EacAbYbL9tgV91SBcKY/+XeeKj4cL5h8iSUViDGZ+93/ygDWR+SF3QfqYkI ADsZpFKWqTknHHXbVQ69ifICFPzRcWUKlEEbhGQIDs9c1kb4cVsDGPOdpm+7Ayu6ED8p VgYmWm1+/i0/hrxIrISagzDBIi+7GSvYJ03euo0bX+LzAjw7Cd3946Pw+lqzpST8VPaA h0QOk9z1L+OQ3mkYDgujsSXW8lpwKMNFCKLukvLn/XZI69IoqrqL+bKAnYqCA3A/abxy 56HH6J03EiN/32ZbDXe322NKYPlZP7NpSx1h4vj0cOeRXwAjNGR0JW9Q5TJfyYDD7tqs +q9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dHXYuA94PVQpCtLzx2v1P+jvZl1DrBI5lhN9gcVELVw=; b=omOIRISJg4T9LtOW0JsmwIMGrOhN8M0bUONr5+WDnapyZ7Oju9H5fbyDDEMch3Hxjj YPAmX19B3PSqM7gKHPzy6ogmLWhez21RwoNsFCmsMnJGCBBrt3p3W7p1xGsqN/TP/HLu 7WPRhMUG8cBBNH+dWw5WHiNCpb7XcyxVzPnR7vrbzhYi46SH09+2wDSY1SVG9SCXYi9I pLRCfIGcFX4v/erns9cLlfAY0c2Q6Cjdj9IylGZD5q+OcnhzIdTRHWGLKNuXGdwpPDpE Q0bEOzNFAAhMZbGPyvF8Ka2fxQp406+A/dB1TVqcA1e7+lbQLxAsDSkKWtS4VMrwt3sN qoPg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53103Dkkjw7dsBpfHmOmpNh0OInpspo02xdiaOak/wLOd5p4sDy/ M2YSpNyLh4fA2dbfVwvo9JIHYN/Jle7/5dOLmu9M2Mw56Jk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwOiDx7lSax+Mw8v90IlkpvdXLDLixLnhw0aPeb5e8qotWAs673eGicrIXMvC4cHH7R+C5u22OhfrXZHUuo/Bs=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:5e52:: with SMTP id s79mr2188523ilb.33.1589952052986; Tue, 19 May 2020 22:20:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Nigel Hamilton <nige@123.do>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 06:20:40 +0100
Message-ID: <CADbPLe05RbHxCs-zwymBxK003K4AuVVmka2W_Xzjpe9jgmjgpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: txauth@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000541c7105a60d8f23"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/txauth/fSoEfZNf3Tnj4Ppr-Q98dfMKCNk>
Subject: [Txauth] Name Game (contd)
X-BeenThere: txauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <txauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/txauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:txauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/txauth>, <mailto:txauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 05:20:57 -0000
Hi, It's a bit disappointing that the voting went awry. It's normal to go through a few iterations however. I personally like WRAC - as it is distinctive and the expanded acronym helps to explain what it does. I just want to flag up, however, that there are some potential trademark problems with it. If it had been submitted prior to the first poll - it would have appeared in the lower list and not made the first voting round. Cheers Nige
- [Txauth] Name Game (contd) Nigel Hamilton
- Re: [Txauth] Name Game (contd) Amanjeev Sethi