Re: Trap protocol operations?
Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us> Fri, 06 November 1992 22:26 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09549; 6 Nov 92 17:26 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09545; 6 Nov 92 17:26 EST
Received: from thumper.bellcore.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19552; 6 Nov 92 17:27 EST
Received: by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA06818> for ietf-archive@nri.reston.va.us; Fri, 6 Nov 92 17:27:31 EST
Received: from dbc.mtview.ca.us (ppp.dbc.mtview.ca.us) by thumper.bellcore.com (4.1/4.7) id <AA06805> for /usr/lib/sendmail -oi -fowner-snmp2 X-snmp2; Fri, 6 Nov 92 17:27:26 EST
Received: from localhost by dbc.mtview.ca.us (5.65/3.1.090690)id AA20158; Fri, 6 Nov 92 14:21:30 -0800
To: mlk%bir.UUCP@mathcs.emory.edu
Reply-To: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com
Cc: snmp2@thumper.bellcore.com
Subject: Re: Trap protocol operations?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 03 Nov 1992 22:29:26 EST." <0D15DDF1.hpbe5t@bir.bir.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1992 14:21:29 -0800
Message-Id: <20153.721088489@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Marshall Rose <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
> Should trap protocol operations be described in 8.5 of SMI for SMP, or > 5.2.6 of Prot Op for SMP? Latter seems to make more sense. Actually, I think it makes more sense having it with the macro description so you can understand exactly how everything relates. There is a backwards pointer in the protocol document for clarity. /mtr
- Re: Trap protocol operations? Marshall Rose