Re: [Unwanted-trackers] John Scudder's Yes on charter-ietf-dult-00-06: (with COMMENT)

[Roman Danyliw <[e-mail]>]

Hi John!

Thanks for the review and the suggested edits.  I've merged them all into 00-07.

Roman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Unwanted-trackers <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of
> John Scudder via Datatracker
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2024 4:43 PM
> To: The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: [Unwanted-trackers] John Scudder's Yes on charter-ietf-dult-00-06:
> (with COMMENT)
> 
> Warning: External Sender - do not click links or open attachments unless you
> recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-dult-00-06: Yes
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email
> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory
> paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dult/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Looks good. Just a few nits:
> 
> - “have interfaces are relevant” should be “have interfaces that are relevant”
> 
> - “To address this threat of unwanted tracking” I suggest “To address the threat
> of unwanted tracking” instead.
> 
> - it looks like the bullets under work item 3 are missing some kind of
> introductory text (“which will:” or similar, I’m not sure what’s appropriate).
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Unwanted-trackers mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/unwanted-trackers