[Unwanted-trackers] John Scudder's Yes on charter-ietf-dult-00-06: (with COMMENT)

John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 28 February 2024 21:42 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: John Scudder via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: dult-chairs@ietf.org, unwanted-trackers@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Message-ID: <170915657319.56455.11684480954173287583@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 13:42:53 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/unwanted-trackers/rcv2YAfJ5v0BnopkPoJ9Z4W4fAE>
Subject: [Unwanted-trackers] John Scudder's Yes on charter-ietf-dult-00-06: (with COMMENT)

John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-dult-00-06: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dult/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Looks good. Just a few nits:

- “have interfaces are relevant” should be “have interfaces that are relevant”

- “To address this threat of unwanted tracking” I suggest “To address the
threat of unwanted tracking” instead.

- it looks like the bullets under work item 3 are missing some kind of
introductory text (“which will:” or similar, I’m not sure what’s appropriate).

[Unwanted-trackers] John Scudder's Yes on charter… John Scudder via Datatracker
Re: [Unwanted-trackers] John Scudder's Yes on cha… Roman Danyliw