Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes
Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org> Mon, 18 July 2011 09:28 UTC
Return-Path: <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F79D21F8B34 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:28:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IyV3-D-zk3MG for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay3.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay3.mail.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1085A21F87BC for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.mail.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.205]) by relay3.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>) id 1Qik7I-0006r4-Ct; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:27:57 +0100
Received: from tinos.zoo.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.24.47]) by smtp0.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>) id 1Qik7I-0004YF-2x; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:27:56 +0100
Message-ID: <4E23FB64.9010107@ninebynine.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 10:22:44 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
References: <4E22A22D.9040804@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E22A22D.9040804@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:28:03 -0000
As skype is so widely used, I think a provisional scheme registration would be sensible, but I don't think any new document should be created. If there's a non-confidential Skype document we can point to, that should be enough. I vaguely recall callto: has been "around" for a while, but don't know if it was ever formally defined. According to http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes (now retired, but still a potential source of useful pointers), it looks as if it may have been a Microsoft specification from 1998 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q157277/). #g -- Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > Hello, > > Skype(tm) is known to use 'skype' and 'callto' URI schemes. There is no > any clear specification of the schemes on the Skype site, nor can I find > it on the Net. However, the syntax is known; it is said to be > (transforming into ABNF): > >> skype-uri = "skype:" name [params] >> name = telephone-subscriber / skype-username >> telephone-subscriber = <as defined in RFC 3966> >> skype-username = ALPHA 5( ALPHA / DIGIT ) *26( ALPHA/DIGIT) >> params = "?" param >> param = "add" / "call" / "chat" / "sendfile" >> / "userinfo" / ext-param >> ext-param = 1*ALPHA >> >> callto-uri = "callto:" name > > The operations of 'callto' URIs are to open a Skype call to <name>; > 'skype' URI provide richer semantics, per <params>. Documentation for > Skype operations is available from > share.skype.com/media/1.2_api_doc_en.pdf (this document says it is > confidential ;-). > > The 'skype' URIs are known to be widely used; 'callto' are also used, > but not as often as 'skype'. Currently, the schemes are not officially > registered with IANA; so my questions is: Can (should?) an effort to > specify these two schemes be undertaken? Any thoughts are welcome. > > Mykyta Yevstifeyev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Uri-review mailing list > Uri-review@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >
- [Uri-review] Correction: 'skype' and 'callto' sch… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes Graham Klyne
- [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes Mykyta Yevstifeyev