Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes
Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org> Mon, 08 August 2011 10:16 UTC
Return-Path: <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8092021F8AAC for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 03:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eGk7WVO0TpFL for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay8.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay8.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A20321F8A7D for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.205]) by relay8.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>) id 1QqMss-0002XY-SN; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:16:34 +0100
Received: from tinos.zoo.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.24.47]) by smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>) id 1QqMss-0007ZK-8W; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:16:34 +0100
Message-ID: <4E3F951A.6020005@ninebynine.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 08:49:46 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
References: <4E22A22D.9040804@gmail.com> <4E23FB64.9010107@ninebynine.org> <4E3F5F4A.7060804@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E3F5F4A.7060804@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 10:16:11 -0000
(NOTE: formal reviewer hat is OFF.) I'm not going to try and comment on the technical correctness of this. I do have two questions: (a) is there a Skype technical document that can be cited, or is this it? How was this information obtained? (b) the contact address is given as contactus@skype.net - are Skype actually involved in this registration? If so, I'd ask if they can release any internat documentation, per (a). If not, I think *you* should be the contact person for this. #g -- Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: > All, > > I finally got to 'skype' URIs now; please see the template below: > >> Registration Template for 'skype' URI Scheme >> >> URI scheme name. >> "skype" >> Status. >> Provisional >> URI scheme syntax. >> The syntax of 'skype' URI described with ABNF [RFC5234] is as >> follows: >> >> skype-uri = "skype:" name [params] >> name = telephone-subscriber / skype-name >> telephone-subscriber = <as defined in RFC 3966 [RFC3966]> >> skype-name = ALPHA 5( ALPHA / DIGIT ) *26 ( ALPHA / DIGIT ) >> params = "?" param >> param = "call" / "add" / "chat" / "sendfile" >> / "userinfo" / ext-param >> ext-param = 1*ALPHA >> >> where <ALPHA> and <DIGIT> rules are defined in RFC 5234. >> URI scheme semantics. >> The 'skype' URI designates the endpoint for a particlar operation >> perfommed by Skype(tm). Such operations are denotes by <param>, >> if present (otherwise, the "call" operation is assumed to be >> default). The folowing table summarizes the posible operations: >> +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+ >> | Keyword | Summary | >> +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+ >> | call | Perform the Skype call to <name>, which is | >> | | either a telephone number or Skype username | >> +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+ >> | add | Add <name> to Skype contact list | >> +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+ >> | chat | Add <name> to Skype contact list and open a | >> | | new chat | >> +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+ >> | sendfile | Send a file to <name> | >> +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+ >> | userinfo | Show information about <name> | >> +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+ >> Please refer to the lates version of Skype API for technical >> description of the operations. >> Encoding considerations. >> None except those discussed in RFC 3968 [RFC3968]. >> Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name. >> Skype(tm) is an only application currently using 'skype' URIs. >> Interoperability considerations. >> None >> Security considerations. >> None except those discussed in RFC 3968 [RFC3968]. >> Contact. >> Skype Technologies S.A. <contactus@skype.net> >> Author/Change controller. >> <TODO> >> References. >> [RFC3966] Schulzrinne, H., "The tel URI for Telephone Numbers", >> RFC 3966, December 2004. >> [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter, >> "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66, >> RFC 3986, January 2005. >> [RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed., and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF >> for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234, >> January 2008. > > If you have any comments, please provide them. > > Thanks, > Mykyta Yevstifeyev > > 18.07.2011 12:22, Graham Klyne wrote: >> As skype is so widely used, I think a provisional scheme registration >> would be sensible, but I don't think any new document should be >> created. If there's a non-confidential Skype document we can point >> to, that should be enough. >> >> I vaguely recall callto: has been "around" for a while, but don't know >> if it was ever formally defined. According to >> http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes (now retired, but still a >> potential source of useful pointers), it looks as if it may have been >> a Microsoft specification from 1998 >> (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q157277/). >> >> #g >> -- >> >> >> Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> Skype(tm) is known to use 'skype' and 'callto' URI schemes. There is >>> no any clear specification of the schemes on the Skype site, nor can >>> I find it on the Net. However, the syntax is known; it is said to be >>> (transforming into ABNF): >>> >>>> skype-uri = "skype:" name [params] >>>> name = telephone-subscriber / skype-username >>>> telephone-subscriber = <as defined in RFC 3966> >>>> skype-username = ALPHA 5( ALPHA / DIGIT ) *26( ALPHA/DIGIT) >>>> params = "?" param >>>> param = "add" / "call" / "chat" / "sendfile" >>>> / "userinfo" / ext-param >>>> ext-param = 1*ALPHA >>>> >>>> callto-uri = "callto:" name >>> >>> The operations of 'callto' URIs are to open a Skype call to <name>; >>> 'skype' URI provide richer semantics, per <params>. Documentation >>> for Skype operations is available from >>> share.skype.com/media/1.2_api_doc_en.pdf (this document says it is >>> confidential ;-). >>> >>> The 'skype' URIs are known to be widely used; 'callto' are also used, >>> but not as often as 'skype'. Currently, the schemes are not >>> officially registered with IANA; so my questions is: Can (should?) an >>> effort to specify these two schemes be undertaken? Any thoughts are >>> welcome. >>> >>> Mykyta Yevstifeyev >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Uri-review mailing list >>> Uri-review@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review >>> >> >> >> >
- [Uri-review] Correction: 'skype' and 'callto' sch… Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes Graham Klyne
- [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes Mykyta Yevstifeyev
- Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes Graham Klyne
- Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes Mykyta Yevstifeyev