Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes

Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org> Mon, 08 August 2011 10:16 UTC

Return-Path: <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8092021F8AAC for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 03:16:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eGk7WVO0TpFL for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay8.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay8.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.171]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A20321F8A7D for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.205]) by relay8.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>) id 1QqMss-0002XY-SN; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:16:34 +0100
Received: from tinos.zoo.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.24.47]) by smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>) id 1QqMss-0007ZK-8W; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:16:34 +0100
Message-ID: <4E3F951A.6020005@ninebynine.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 08:49:46 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <GK-lists@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
References: <4E22A22D.9040804@gmail.com> <4E23FB64.9010107@ninebynine.org> <4E3F5F4A.7060804@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E3F5F4A.7060804@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] 'skype' and 'callto' schemes
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 10:16:11 -0000

(NOTE: formal reviewer hat is OFF.)

I'm not going to try and comment on the technical correctness of this.

I do have two questions:

(a) is there a Skype technical document that can be cited, or is this it?  How 
was this information obtained?

(b) the contact address is given as contactus@skype.net - are Skype actually 
involved in this registration?  If so, I'd ask if they can release any internat 
documentation, per (a).  If not, I think *you* should be the contact person for 
this.

#g
--


Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
> All,
> 
> I finally got to 'skype' URIs now; please see the template below:
> 
>>   Registration Template for 'skype' URI Scheme
>>
>>    URI scheme name.
>>       "skype"
>>    Status.
>>       Provisional
>>    URI scheme syntax.
>>       The syntax of 'skype' URI described with ABNF [RFC5234] is as
>>       follows:
>>
>>       skype-uri  = "skype:" name [params]
>>       name       = telephone-subscriber / skype-name
>>       telephone-subscriber = <as defined in RFC 3966 [RFC3966]>
>>       skype-name = ALPHA 5( ALPHA / DIGIT ) *26 ( ALPHA / DIGIT )
>>       params     = "?" param
>>       param      = "call" / "add" / "chat" / "sendfile"
>>                  / "userinfo" / ext-param
>>       ext-param  = 1*ALPHA
>>
>>       where <ALPHA> and <DIGIT> rules are defined in RFC 5234.
>>    URI scheme semantics.
>>       The 'skype' URI designates the endpoint for a particlar operation
>>       perfommed by Skype(tm).  Such operations are denotes by <param>,
>>       if present (otherwise, the "call" operation is assumed to be
>>       default).  The folowing table summarizes the posible operations:
>>       +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
>>       | Keyword         | Summary                                     |
>>       +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
>>       | call            | Perform the Skype call to <name>, which is  |
>>       |                 | either a telephone number or Skype username |
>>       +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
>>       | add             | Add <name> to Skype contact list            |
>>       +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
>>       | chat            | Add <name> to Skype contact list and open a |
>>       |                 | new chat                                    |
>>       +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
>>       | sendfile        | Send a file to <name>                       |
>>       +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
>>       | userinfo        | Show information about <name>               |
>>       +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
>>       Please refer to the lates version of Skype API for technical
>>       description of the operations.
>>    Encoding considerations.
>>       None except those discussed in RFC 3968 [RFC3968].
>>    Applications/protocols that use this URI scheme name.
>>       Skype(tm) is an only application currently using 'skype' URIs.
>>    Interoperability considerations.
>>       None
>>    Security considerations.
>>       None except those discussed in RFC 3968 [RFC3968].
>>    Contact.
>>       Skype Technologies S.A. <contactus@skype.net>
>>    Author/Change controller.
>> <TODO>
>>    References.
>>       [RFC3966] Schulzrinne, H., "The tel URI for Telephone Numbers",
>>         RFC 3966, December 2004.
>>       [RFC3986] Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R., and L. Masinter,
>>         "Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax", STD 66,
>>        RFC 3986, January 2005.
>>       [RFC5234]  Crocker, D., Ed., and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF
>>         for Syntax Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
>>         January 2008.
> 
> If you have any comments, please provide them.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mykyta Yevstifeyev
> 
> 18.07.2011 12:22, Graham Klyne wrote:
>> As skype is so widely used, I think a provisional scheme registration 
>> would be sensible, but I don't think any new document should be 
>> created.  If there's a non-confidential Skype document we can point 
>> to, that should be enough.
>>
>> I vaguely recall callto: has been "around" for a while, but don't know 
>> if it was ever formally defined.  According to 
>> http://www.w3.org/Addressing/schemes (now retired, but still a 
>> potential source of useful pointers), it looks as if it may have been 
>> a Microsoft specification from 1998 
>> (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q157277/).
>>
>> #g
>> -- 
>>
>>
>> Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Skype(tm) is known to use 'skype' and 'callto' URI schemes.  There is 
>>> no any clear specification of the schemes on the Skype site, nor can 
>>> I find it on the Net.  However, the syntax is known; it is said to be 
>>> (transforming into ABNF):
>>>
>>>> skype-uri      = "skype:" name [params]
>>>> name           = telephone-subscriber / skype-username
>>>> telephone-subscriber = <as defined in RFC 3966>
>>>> skype-username = ALPHA 5( ALPHA / DIGIT ) *26( ALPHA/DIGIT)
>>>> params         = "?" param
>>>> param          = "add" / "call" / "chat" / "sendfile"
>>>>                / "userinfo" / ext-param
>>>> ext-param      = 1*ALPHA
>>>>
>>>> callto-uri     = "callto:" name
>>>
>>> The operations of 'callto' URIs are to open a Skype call to <name>; 
>>> 'skype' URI provide richer semantics, per <params>.  Documentation 
>>> for Skype operations is available from 
>>> share.skype.com/media/1.2_api_doc_en.pdf (this document says it is 
>>> confidential ;-).
>>>
>>> The 'skype' URIs are known to be widely used; 'callto' are also used, 
>>> but not as often as 'skype'.  Currently, the schemes are not 
>>> officially registered with IANA; so my questions is: Can (should?) an 
>>> effort to specify these two schemes be undertaken?  Any thoughts are 
>>> welcome.
>>>
>>> Mykyta Yevstifeyev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Uri-review mailing list
>>> Uri-review@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>