[Uri-review] Re: rfc4622bis: review requested
Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Thu, 07 June 2007 18:32 UTC
Return-path: <uri-review-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwMmY-00034l-9m; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:32:26 -0400
Received: from uri-review by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HwMmW-0002zy-GP for uri-review-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:32:24 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwMmW-0002zf-16 for uri-review@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:32:24 -0400
Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwMmU-0001tY-IZ for uri-review@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:32:24 -0400
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Jun 2007 18:32:20 -0000
Received: from p508F9544.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO [192.168.178.22]) [80.143.149.68] by mail.gmx.net (mp028) with SMTP; 07 Jun 2007 20:32:20 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19SxTwMo1dStZQufvPvAXYOoNx8Mcj8XnJkXQUfTj UYs0KJYByjS4BC
Message-ID: <46684F31.8000802@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:32:17 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@jabber.org>
References: <20070607182031.GF31365@jabber.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070607182031.GF31365@jabber.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
Cc: uri@w3.org, uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: [Uri-review] Re: rfc4622bis: review requested
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org
Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > As previously pointed out, there are some errors in RFC 4622. I have > attempted to correct them here: > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc4622bis-00.txt > > No one has told me there are errors in rfc4622bis, but since Roy > Fielding said RFC 4622 is broken and should be removed from the > standards track [1] I want to make sure that my attempted corrections > are indeed correct. > > Unless I receive feedback that rfc4622bis does not fix the problems with > RFC 4622, I will assume that it does, complete another pass through the > document to ensure that it is as correct as I can make it, then request > a standards action from the appropriate AD. > > Thanks! (1) I think you should have a section stating what the changes are. (2) Independently of that, a diff to RFC4622 would be useful, such as in <http://tools.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/rfcdiff.pyht?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4622.txt&url2=http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc4622bis-00.txt>. (3) <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-saintandre-rfc4622bis-00#section-3.8> says: "See Section 5 of RFC 4622, Security Considerations." There may be other instances like that. (4) Front matter should say: "Obsoletes: 4622". Best regards, Julian _______________________________________________ Uri-review mailing list Uri-review@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review
- [Uri-review] rfc4622bis: review requested Peter Saint-Andre
- [Uri-review] Re: rfc4622bis: review requested Peter Saint-Andre
- [Uri-review] Re: rfc4622bis: review requested Julian Reschke
- [Uri-review] Re: rfc4622bis: review requested Peter Saint-Andre
- [Uri-review] Re: rfc4622bis: review requested Peter Saint-Andre
- [Uri-review] Re: rfc4622bis: review requested Julian Reschke