IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Uri-review] rfc4622bis: review requested

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@jabber.org> Thu, 07 June 2007 18:15 UTC

Return-path: <uri-review-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwMWC-0006UR-Qr; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:15:32 -0400
Received: from uri-review by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HwMWC-0006UH-27 for uri-review-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:15:32 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwMWB-0006U3-Nr for uri-review@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:15:31 -0400
Received: from atlas.jabber.org ([208.245.212.69]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HwMW8-0003mF-Fx for uri-review@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:15:31 -0400
Received: by atlas.jabber.org (Postfix, from userid 1005) id CF6D221A47D; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:20:31 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:20:31 -0500
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@jabber.org>
To: uri@w3.org, uri-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20070607182031.GF31365@jabber.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Jabber-ID: stpeter@jabber.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc:
Subject: [Uri-review] rfc4622bis: review requested
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: uri-review-bounces@ietf.org

As previously pointed out, there are some errors in RFC 4622. I have
attempted to correct them here:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-saintandre-rfc4622bis-00.txt

No one has told me there are errors in rfc4622bis, but since Roy
Fielding said RFC 4622 is broken and should be removed from the
standards track [1] I want to make sure that my attempted corrections 
are indeed correct.

Unless I receive feedback that rfc4622bis does not fix the problems with
RFC 4622, I will assume that it does, complete another pass through the
document to ensure that it is as correct as I can make it, then request
a standards action from the appropriate AD.

Thanks!

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
XMPP Standards Foundation
http://www.xmpp.org/xsf/people/stpeter.shtml



_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email