IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Uri-review] [uri-review] Review Request for Icon URI Scheme

Pierre-Antoine LaFayette <pierre@alumni.utoronto.ca> Mon, 05 April 2010 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <pierre@alumni.utoronto.ca>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135B63A6A00 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 08:12:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.624
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.624 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a5PRoyXI2vLr for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 08:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153DB28C14C for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 08:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so2139657gyh.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.100.243.8 with SMTP id q8mr4095060anh.241.1270480347378; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm8460421gxk.6.2010.04.05.08.12.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so2139647gyh.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.107.6 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Apr 2010 08:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Pierre-Antoine LaFayette <pierre@alumni.utoronto.ca>
Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:12:05 -0400
Received: by 10.151.21.3 with SMTP id y3mr4047917ybi.61.1270480345650; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:12:25 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <m2v743256c51004050812w2a5a95f2y57104ee6aafa0be6@mail.gmail.com>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd24862b2578004837ec172"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:06:53 -0700
Subject: [Uri-review] [uri-review] Review Request for Icon URI Scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:14:07 -0000

Hi everyone!

I've put together a draft document for an icon URI scheme, used for
displaying platform specific icons in web pages, that I would like to get
some feedback on.

http://draft-icon-uri-scheme.googlecode.com/hg/draft-lafayette-icon-uri-scheme-00.html
.

Discussion of this scheme has been going on in the
public-webapps@w3.orgmailing list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/public-webapps@w3.org/msg07377.html

Thanks.

-- 
Pierre.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email