Re: [Uri-review] [uri-review] Review Request for Icon URI Scheme

Pierre-Antoine LaFayette <pierre@alumni.utoronto.ca> Mon, 26 April 2010 12:01 UTC

Return-Path: <pierre@alumni.utoronto.ca>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CFC3A6B6E for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.309
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.309 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.667, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kwg4eFABgkh2 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:01:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f199.google.com (mail-pz0-f199.google.com [209.85.222.199]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DF728C0F7 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:00:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so927984pzk.29 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.188.27 with SMTP id q27mr3447295rvp.73.1272283242330; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm2689798ywh.9.2010.04.26.05.00.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so6345010gyh.31 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.213.14 with SMTP id l14mr3408482ybg.241.1272283240133; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.151.48.1 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 05:00:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BD54491.2060006@gmx.de>
References: <201004152059.WAA22925@TR-Sys.de> <n2j743256c51004251741w9ffadfb8wc80d0b50b69741b2@mail.gmail.com> <4BD54491.2060006@gmx.de>
From: Pierre-Antoine LaFayette <pierre@alumni.utoronto.ca>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 08:00:20 -0400
Message-ID: <s2g743256c51004260500saf02bacbxbd24ae5e3a2a349e@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000e0cd35abc94f8ee04852286ef"
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [uri-review] Review Request for Icon URI Scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:01:03 -0000

Hmm. I was using v1.35pre1; thought it was the latest. The update fixed it.

Thanks.

On 26 April 2010 03:45, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:

> On 26.04.2010 02:41, Pierre-Antoine LaFayette wrote:
>
>> I've updated
>>
>> http://draft-icon-uri-scheme.googlecode.com/hg/draft-lafayette-icon-uri-scheme-00.htmlto
>> not use RFC 1738.
>>
>> On another note, how do I resolve the following warning?
>>
>> /idnits 2.12.02/
>> /
>> /
>> /draft-lafayette-icon-uri-scheme-00.txt:/
>> /
>> /
>> /  Checking boilerplate required by RFC 5378 and the IETF Trust (see/
>> / http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info):/
>> /
>>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------/
>> /
>> /
>> /  == You're using the IETF Trust Provisions' Section 6.b License Notice
>> from 12/
>> /     Sep 2009 rather than the newer Notice from 28 Dec 2009.  (See/
>> / http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/)/
>>
>> I'm using xml2rfc to generate the documents from
>>
>> http://draft-icon-uri-scheme.googlecode.com/hg/draft-lafayette-icon-uri-scheme.xml
>> .
>>
>
> Which version of xml2rfc.tcl are you using. The one that was released on
> March 31 (1.35) should generate the up-to-date boilerplate...
>
> Best regards, Julian
>



-- 
Pierre.