Re: [Uri-review] URI resolution questions
Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Thu, 27 February 2020 17:09 UTC
Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94A23A0D0B for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:09:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5S3CHrpN9JC7 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB543A0D3B for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 09:09:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxusgaltgw10.schlund.de ([10.72.72.56]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus001 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M4q55-1jLASK0sGb-00yz06; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 18:09:37 +0100
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:09:36 -0500
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Reply-To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, uri-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1285517896.32083.1582823376975@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <01a901d5ed0f$02d8e980$088abc80$@acm.org>
References: <1404861506.56788.1582761910043@email.ionos.com> <01a901d5ed0f$02d8e980$088abc80$@acm.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.1-Rev27
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:d14+B9GPXp5jEeuTQBkj2jbqKTTcHuEWLyEApp0wb5PAAdQ76XK mhLUVZSNyRNxxpLM+U1flRq9wRqys+T7hb2ekunn0j0cYmsJbwprQ1PXiO1/zR1fBHCGSDh EYFT5POLerq2GfObrfQnfut2VkTFgJXssGdyMowL+7DLsZ7QnsJwTPxHM8MDy6hDO/otnDn OpAkpJKy0EpEWV9YYIRXw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:q3cEGz2KGGQ=:PSp1YayBYzwcm0+FjZP7yf U5M69anavkqzaNz+IgR+T7Ts18p8mwBpjhO+22mJ9UzpYQQ7gWsb0IQiRL7x5GqFh4zkC1+ir gAm9726RQ5jj11auv9fig2g6juXQfcrG/JNjOMete87DkoIzpDYuALTkDXuGIDx5NDSpfhOgA dViEaWImV4A+MuOfJ3icV1TBWo+QvY4ACJckDA068JEatNeDyhj2N1oYp9Wh/q3Jfh2CGfpXh VGSfieonO+g817oVTtR8MGMFUIAj5aQ9mmaJjMNcxZxo9+cS9ouC2CKDCYCWiDbSgHwThB9dW r7OzCT9MjXXtDWt36hM3IQrcuoj/a57QOE4fCaD9+BFrL1PKK3rkUl0byQyK0ERZE7jYfdJR3 th/7xZoINfE8g0FciMTAlo76WLAuqK3WA0Bz7NXrHtlTHZ79ND1u3HrDoqMi5l19qGQ3JogBf d8AqRV9Tvk823m23vVSoXfdpvhW2v9Ite9PLGBOIDPD9XWbbUMpRWgeNZwsdeXQzTnuDT5UVO vNNN0eXNnA1u8ATie0n1QFfJX7n3gxrT5sOZp028axTgDZ+j5AYqk40Q3vvYlYMTRHZr38Zqs OBRKRRN3sH85VFJlSmjcvJzcQbaKLRMDVXiMUjTShQzIEKWEdS/o7EL20OXPfaFdwDsVyLGdm 4LVRXOqDZ00tUDfYSivQAE9GemwDvb3d81zA28JBcDu87kxH+kNuJqeXMHs9Gv7r+AgXmyCRm yQU1ma+ZdgcX8uMOLtztsqzVsB1TSEJ+ViNu8/C6JphJ9W1u/UzfLgSRD2qhP2aVRMsgX0JhR oc2t2nm31bH3adN7+WoWyvc/5iZjmEojiEU9+8Q42ISOCYU+5vi/5OCxPyHepSRcscCgkVa
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/Iv3JnwWlnlFE9HNygzkv2uwhQkk>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] URI resolution questions
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:09:48 -0000
On February 26, 2020 at 8:41 PM Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org> wrote:
Uh… I can’t make sense of your question
From: Uri-review <uri-review-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Timothy Mcsweeney
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2020 4:05 PM
To: uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: [Uri-review] URI resolution questions
Hello All,
It was generously suggested that I may get some questions answered here about URI resolution so here it goes:
If I have a scheme name and a string like "example:123456" and the the string will be used for further processing by a second NAPTR , would I want to use the I2Rs mnemonic with a "p" flag in the first NAPTR?
And in this scenario, if the answer to the query of the second NAPTR is terminal , does the answer go back to where the first query originated from?
What happens to the string during the resolution process?
I have been trying to set up a test environment for this but have not yet been successful so any tips/tricks, or tools would be greatly appreciated.
Tim
- [Uri-review] URI resolution questions Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] URI resolution questions Larry Masinter
- Re: [Uri-review] URI resolution questions Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: [Uri-review] URI resolution questions Timothy Mcsweeney