[Uri-review] URI resolution questions

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Thu, 27 February 2020 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3AF3A0C1F for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:05:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sFVr9mnjGv41 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:05:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31A093A0C17 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 16:05:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxusgaltgw01.schlund.de ([10.72.72.47]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus001 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lh4nx-1jixaD2Ixr-00oVS7 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 01:05:10 +0100
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 19:05:10 -0500 (EST)
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Reply-To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1404861506.56788.1582761910043@email.ionos.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.1-Rev27
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:R8tbpA1KijfRij2cO4F0kUt5wTqEv3X+x7FC3S1AtW6CHEbFsVK ooSST9ssCGE8lt98qHZeMO+CSONxUuQehiTZM0yNFvntvJPki1mTIBkIuTy3sw3te1Efr8B InAcxhCda9op5YDe/S/edprqhB2lyvu/3U2681X1WEoj+T6fU4iicGToCMyeaeKQU+3jdZs gPKgeJ0ZdR7vIynxx/RJg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:xQO3iKgkbJM=:S72HlQ6cJlsNGXjls9UMBT UC1KNtk2SMJrCKQ4w52ecxNTEAf3XNYppmMOmpx7hXyXOU+ZQ6aSNbHQ5wJdRItJVnOX2E6JW 7aRPUm6Pkav2ltxyCZ/LJK02/ICnqzs96pDgxywUNxF6l4LKxVy3YpDQAenHxOXzvBsVve8w5 idlp4jouzZyTzmKhEYXxfIapP46TxRDmpRX2lD6esDfKPdhnJCV8upp9Fw2YuP9zz1x6iVlZV /vjvQASwLFaZtHz7lb5a68z4vSS71dR2/LCZdFFiCW3ouzwI4VVFPo+lYb4ApzbWnNeye/tvb bzmiB4jp72BRAkqrAiK86hQS48gsDwFmBPZd/UyZEBbPmNl8ElZMTaAh5GK51LdZEdGnULuOY o0BDdRH2ho5Mm30coG4JB2XDW549tNOXA7QJACoMj5JyOMfQF2vEEJEiAkltVsjeOR4DQXmIq T6unv9Hi+4mMb9q7H2mZhe8K+7p0dmC1om2TKBkOz8UtAxxJSUPPWVYiWGQCPzhASmXG0w748 efTEtlW4vC0uJwDp7q/6Jzoi8D9UHBjQHOqflZ6QrUyGjOYg2aHnyJRjP7c/QiHsdW5nNZfM+ /zg57qJPHk2Ni3mTtDMxvtm645OdZueEE2gsQkKb6K5iZGTWYPNwNF5QYz7WXcLXX2MCrOf4V 22/DqjG7SK16p4I3jRQXqY/DhpFbcXvO7IEYvqhhOwx9d/CoL+PWwZ1qqHmsOqzVIeBVzvBXw EhfPYmibIh8Z3Y3lvPM9BuE+tYCoZ3qekY1YBO6NhjJ+Ro5uzugu6vRTx1a6/v73ReNFU/HtQ JySVuRNyJGfX7fw9oMuzdPXM8ONGEIBLregyapVKIqqPiKLOMswMH3hR3GLbPwNyPPZIGLy
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/fNYc3Hk8sjam0Oq4WzaM7HYTdvY>
Subject: [Uri-review] URI resolution questions
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:05:12 -0000

Hello All,
It was generously suggested that I may get some questions answered here about URI resolution so here it goes:

If I have a scheme name and a string like "example:123456" and the the string will be used for further processing by a second NAPTR , would I want to use the I2Rs mnemonic with a "p" flag in the first NAPTR? 

 And in this scenario, if the answer to the query of the second NAPTR is terminal , does the answer go back to where the first query originated from?

What happens to the string during the resolution process?  

I have been trying to set up a test environment for this but have not yet been successful so any tips/tricks, or tools would be greatly appreciated.

Tim