Re: [Uri-review] [IANA #1270959] Registration of dhttp Schema name (uri-schemes)

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 10 May 2023 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169CDC17D685 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2023 09:04:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmx.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fVcQZE_oSqH0 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2023 09:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A51CC17D672 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2023 09:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1683734661; i=julian.reschke@gmx.de; bh=YDyapyPHKae0HxZh95YXpZMgC0L4rw2IC7lRVFUbScI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=NSklkvs6U1++QPE82rSYSY8+Vl/nVAoGVBA7mMn+odjzEvI/mAqBKH3eNy5GbKXde N3FKvv8M+cau8g70joyhBgfQut8nGKwk9swreDUYMRZRi5lcxiSSUvQoqHcWDtf7AW EeH8/InOp6Js4H/dR988d4UhBvBL6oWW6burR0wivPWwIIciIfFUAoWwU5+OCqnnvH DWkOCBDrqHQLFNZprCBkN7QcKTDF7jF0qP5Vz1ltubbX85WIWE4B9l2jIRt8dqvRPq nXjc9zs53eUdJgeXcoZvmXQqLpU6eDTN4s+pwv5C6xtqd2qu1IhpuMmxwqY7/ZZF4W VCBwX1BCw14/w==
X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a
Received: from [192.168.178.179] ([217.251.128.81]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1ML9uU-1peYxb2dmM-00IEG3 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2023 18:04:21 +0200
Message-ID: <24f732a1-2f66-eda0-a878-e1363ba2d733@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 18:04:20 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: uri-review@ietf.org
References: <RT-Ticket-1270959@icann.org> <CAEp-PA_SGScCnxZjpFszTPR+uR==R2gjNV-QoBLiWHok7fvXWA@mail.gmail.com> <rt-5.0.3-126466-1681773256-807.1270959-37-0@icann.org> <24115C2D-8C2F-45D5-BB80-C30F653C019B@gbiv.com> <CA+9kkMAOiVqt5Ywr5ZpL1vNWZDQrraW+2E__ZzWJS6NVuc1rPw@mail.gmail.com> <1f06aca4-5aa1-a04c-6345-8f0b6895e95b@ninebynine.org> <87ba8eed-f040-70f9-d67d-76a8e9708a35@ninebynine.org>
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <87ba8eed-f040-70f9-d67d-76a8e9708a35@ninebynine.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:3G5Gbtn+zvsXJcJRqXEuGZuwO5cU8PSj4Y+mcURjwK1O3vVBVUV 7iZAbbQbql/Pw6LzHbRd5eH/OZTfRcM3TIVgousyhEiBAjxCFA2JXzUSfg9bRcwWZYm9P+d jYWuEzeBhMlDNdupU3fSS6CwTDv/ztP3SJaETgO7Jf/2qwLlUX9kgN7aE5DiAQ61t/xlpxf nGNM71zpR5NCeJ6KbDn+A==
UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:mYYhZijEQic=;z4C751JTkUP8gUemLywnYx3G6Q8 xrUmGZHMcJSpIdk23ivgj15ngwYuaLQLiXrrDEajyKA8+OP6ilEvK04CMWEH0UWyAzz821fsF 85KIki38BYNzmcWj/BbISA1aroXvCdFvU6kpyHTcnx4tGOzRSLXeZYXmdssPbvpVPImneQ31b q6OiDMkPEkdBTSy8P6KIxV8EKM7/VVCBJthtRa8IhdV9K9N/X6rM33pNBbFKBMg33WnKU6mHI VLzEm2jBB/1ytjD+6Hih5oue7ZL5ttrk933fIUfW2nocOvi4rQV0X2dqJZPjnIhJA+AN+seWO 2mzB6bqrVtT8nDjLrKrC8nt5K7qUkws4n7M5kJqBmMuGKe280x2vs9tSXrlrkx4g1F49NpdUj CKBZo5aoFYLTuFKNeH+eIshNNJfx/NqFGoXj4yyUL1C14hL/Q7kQ94tpMTVXsjHXNGIblaubG h2Dl7yNCeX6bHSByC9CdFLYx5t0ZyXTjyfTvQJ20RP4g7l4VhOWDxs0D2UpArTDjZ52FIQCmP fX53L1Rd11gCZN2/VuwF0RYgb0vFMYsvOsvr8hpg9iaXo6onCZaB2W1wu50kphn+Bsyx/RhPn 8c3kqu0pezxj8NJuU7SUw1gEnb10tgteoK3mZvCePvSeNJyTwSVvtznVs7CbbNOmYZ0AVeD1o G6KVRKZ7zy7LCZZtw5t0+2m6mBKemabDp4aYutBzyEwNLgtCErUzScFsuabL2fF00czayGjuv UX6RbzbieN+4PSXNDiqarLWXo1ZkHpjtw9qgZVW1Q4Mfqm+x+LljRGx0CAyTFl4hAwaWn29xn wpdMpJEvCcAiA2+yHAGECrQExcStSCPvPAy+RrRHSZdycNOnvKRIC//IEXKue9E5fvrxEtILj lR0vrChRrz+JnfOQxLN1pm1d3rcB45WXaZtH7Ggw5N+Vi92CpsQkqwXYZZXm7Elq/bpTP6oBI pz6CgElR2Wa/Eiz3aq69I9aTt0s=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/KCzSYLbmAMrKeiskDiJdRnYeIZs>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] [IANA #1270959] Registration of dhttp Schema name (uri-schemes)
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 16:04:29 -0000

On 10.05.2023 17:40, Graham Klyne wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> (IANA cc'ed, but no action requested at this time.)
>
>
> I've drafted a possible note for addition to the provisional
> registration template for 'dhttp' [1]
>
> [1] https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/dhttp
>
> The intent is not to make a definitive statement about the goodness or
> badness of the scheme, but simply to act as a health warning of
> potential issues, and to highlight that its publication is NOT a
> recommendation for its use by the IETF.  Does this look reasonable?
>
> Proposed note follows.
>
> #g
>
>
> ## IANA reviewer note
>
> This scheme has been provisionally registered under the “first come
> first served” policy set out in RFC 7595.  This means that the scheme
> has not been formally reviewed in the IETF, and is not recommended by
> the IETF for general use on the open Internet.
>
> Further, the `dhttp` scheme is considered harmful by some in the IETF
> [R1] for at least the following reasons:
>
> 1. it creates confusion around the existing HTTP and HTTPS schemes.
> 2. ‘dhttp’ is defined to be an alias of the provisionally registered
> ‘web3’ scheme, and URI aliases are, in general, considered harmful to
> the World Wide Web [R2].
> 3. the activity known as “web3” [R3] has attracted much criticism, and
> is considered by some to be an attempt to insinuate controversial
> blockchain technology into the fabric of the World Wide Web.  Using the
> name ‘dhttp’ appears to be an attempt to legitimise web3 by association
> with HTTP (the current World Wide Web’s primary interaction protocol).
>
> This note is intended to draw attention to potential problems that might
> arise if this scheme were to be used widely on the open Internet, and
> does not itself constitute a position by the IETF or IANA on the
> considerations raised.
>
> [R1]
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/4Sj8k6rLZzqZsGgMEe6fLM-wE4U/
>
> [R2] https://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#uri-aliases
>
> [R3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web3
>
> ]]

Sounds good.

Thanks a lot for doing this!