IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Uri-review] Any concerns with draft-yevstifeyev-xri-uri-rsrv?

Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> Tue, 09 August 2011 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <GK@ninebynine.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8825321F8B43 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 03:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DQc9t4Z+VZxz for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 03:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay0.mail.ox.ac.uk (relay0.mail.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5EAE21F8B40 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 03:52:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.205]) by relay0.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from <GK@ninebynine.org>) id 1Qqjvl-0006qQ-0z; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:53:05 +0100
Received: from tinos.zoo.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.24.47]) by smtp2.mail.ox.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <GK@ninebynine.org>) id 1Qqjvk-0004a4-9Y; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:53:05 +0100
Message-ID: <4E410EE5.8000704@ninebynine.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:41:41 +0100
From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev <evnikita2@gmail.com>
References: <4DF2F2C1.1000106@gmail.com> <4DF45C2F.7040301@ninebynine.org> <4E3E207D.5090005@gmail.com> <4E3FAA09.1020100@ninebynine.org> <4E40F2A0.30903@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E40F2A0.30903@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Oxford-Username: zool0635
Cc: "uri-review@ietf.org" <uri-review@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Any concerns with draft-yevstifeyev-xri-uri-rsrv?
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 10:52:38 -0000

Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>> (2) I found your reference [XRISyntax3] was a bit unsatisfactory in 
>> two ways: (a) it clearly marked as a work-in-progress, and as such a 
>> poor basis for a normative reference in an IETF document, and (b) it 
>> is somewhat inconvenient in that no URI or actionable link was 
>> provided for it.
> 
> I think when XRI 3.0 is processed, a new document "moving 'xri' to 
> Historic" will be published; now I'm OK to remove [XRISyntax3] from the 
> document.

I'd be inclined to leave it in as informational, with a link to the OASIS 
landing page for the work-in-progress, as it is part of the background 
discussion and rationale.

(I'm not  sure if it makes sense to have normative references in a informational 
publication, but I'll let RFC editor or whoever make the appropriate call on that.)

#g
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email