Re: [Uri-review] Any concerns with draft-yevstifeyev-xri-uri-rsrv?

[Mykyta Yevstifeyev <[e-mail]>]

09.08.2011 13:41, Graham Klyne wrote:
> Mykyta Yevstifeyev wrote:
>>> (2) I found your reference [XRISyntax3] was a bit unsatisfactory in 
>>> two ways: (a) it clearly marked as a work-in-progress, and as such a 
>>> poor basis for a normative reference in an IETF document, and (b) it 
>>> is somewhat inconvenient in that no URI or actionable link was 
>>> provided for it.
>>
>> I think when XRI 3.0 is processed, a new document "moving 'xri' to 
>> Historic" will be published; now I'm OK to remove [XRISyntax3] from 
>> the document.
>
> I'd be inclined to leave it in as informational, with a link to the 
> OASIS landing page for the work-in-progress, as it is part of the 
> background discussion and rationale.
>
> (I'm not  sure if it makes sense to have normative references in a 
> informational publication, but I'll let RFC editor or whoever make the 
> appropriate call on that.)

I've just uploaded a new revision of the draft.  Please see 
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yevstifeyev-xri-uri-rsrv-02.  I'm 
planing to process it as Independent Submission, so I'll contact ISE to 
process it.

Mykyta

>
> #g
> -- 
>
>