[Uri-review] [IANA #1273251] URI-schemes registry - 'w3' scheme - request to add reviewer note

Amanda Baber via RT <iana-issues@iana.org> Fri, 26 May 2023 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EED0C151553 for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 May 2023 09:55:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cu4IMbJNqD7d for <uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 May 2023 09:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1320C151545 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 May 2023 09:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request6.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9407E392A; Fri, 26 May 2023 16:55:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request6.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 845C04AF45; Fri, 26 May 2023 16:55:30 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-issues@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-issues@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <e13df9e6-7a98-aa2c-ed8e-52f5b2a59e8e@ninebynine.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1273251@icann.org> <e13df9e6-7a98-aa2c-ed8e-52f5b2a59e8e@ninebynine.org>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-555700-1685120130-132.1273251-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1273251
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
To: GK@ninebynine.org
CC: uri-review@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 16:55:30 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/uri-review/T5xw3mqFknGlBFzGleYBon21JUY>
Subject: [Uri-review] [IANA #1273251] URI-schemes registry - 'w3' scheme - request to add reviewer note
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/uri-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 16:55:35 -0000

Hi all,

We've added the note below to the URI schemes registry. (All expert notes are now linked from the relevant entry's "Description" field.) Please see

https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes

Best regards,

Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager

On Wed May 24 12:58:22 2023, GK@ninebynine.org wrote:
> Hi
> 
> (This is loosely related to earlier discussions of the registry entry
> for 'dhttp')
> 
> I'd like to request that the note below be added to the provisional
> registry
> entry for scheme 'w3'.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Graham.
> 
> 
> ## IANA reviewer note
> 
> This scheme has been provisionally registered under the “first come
> first
> served” policy set out in RFC 7595.  This means that the scheme has
> not been
> formally reviewed in the IETF, and is not recommended by the IETF for
> general
> use on the open Internet.
> 
> Further, the ‘w3’ scheme is defined to be an abbreviation of the
> ‘web3’ scheme,
> and URI aliases are, in general, considered harmful to the World Wide
> Web [R1].
> 
> (This note is intended to draw attention to potential problems that
> might arise
> if this scheme were to be used widely on the open Internet, and does
> not itself
> constitute a formal position by the IETF or IANA.)
> 
> [R1] https://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#uri-aliases