[Uri-review] [IANA #1278861] Request for Assignment (uri-schemes)

[David Dong via RT <[e-mail]>]

Dear Mike,

We've added provisional URI scheme "openid" to the registry:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes/prov/openid

Registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes

Per the designated expert for URI Schemes registry, we're also notifying the [e-mail] mailing list that this provisional registration has been completed.

Best regards,

David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist

On Wed Aug 16 00:11:45 2023, [e-mail] wrote:
> The RFC 7595 registration template contents can be found at
> https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0-
> 31.html#URISchemeContents.
> 
> Let me know if you need any additional information.
> 
> Thanks,
> -- Mike
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Dong via RT <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2023 5:15 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Subject: [IANA #1278861] Request for Assignment (uri-schemes)
> 
> Hi Mike,
> 
> Thank you for the quick reply. We will proceed with this as a
> provisional registration.
> 
> Could you please fill out the template as per RFC 7595?
> 
> Please see:
> 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7595.html#page-13
> 
> You can see some examples of existing templates in the registry:
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes
> 
> Please let us know if you have any questions.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> David Dong
> IANA Services Sr. Specialist
> 
> On Mon Aug 14 23:54:29 2023, [e-mail] wrote:
> > Provisional registration would be fine at this time.  Please proceed
> > to do so.
> >
> > As for there being a standard, I'll note that the use of the
> > "openid:"
> > URI scheme was established by the OpenID Connect Core 1.0 standard in
> > 2014.  Yes, I do understand that the spec does not fully specify the
> > URI syntax, which is why the working group is OK with provisional
> > registration at this time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -- Mike
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Dong via RT <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2023 2:59 PM
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Cc: [e-mail]
> > Subject: [IANA #1278861] Request for Assignment (uri-schemes)
> >
> > Hi Michael (ccing: [e-mail]),
> >
> > Please see below for review from Graham Klyne.
> >
> > Please let us if you would like to proceed with a provisional
> > registration instead as well.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > David Dong
> > IANA Services Sr. Specialist
> >
> > --
> >
> > Referring to:
> > https://openi/
> > d.net%2Fspecs%2Fopenid-connect-core-1_0-
> > &data=05%7C01%7C%7Cc0a1697d391
> > 342c2bde908db9d249928%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638
> > 276552748913695%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2
> > luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FuTH0mIkEhf
> > i0nfbj%2B1ZzHFphYEFTUnk8kbh7xpAyPA%3D&reserved=0
> > 31.html#URISchemeRegistry
> >
> > I would say that this is OK for provisional registration, but not yet
> > for permanent registration.
> >
> > Problems I'm seeing are:
> >
> > 1.  the reference provided in the registration template does not
> > appear to provide a URI specification.  Among other things, I'm
> > expecting there to be a syntax specification that can be checked for
> > conformity with RFC3986 generic URI syntax.  Also there are other
> > considerations mentioned at
> > https://www.r/
> > fc-
> > %2F&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cc0a1697d391342c2bde908db9d249928%7C84df9e7fe9
> > f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638276552748913695%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG
> > Zsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%
> > 3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=tumBFqPkR1ZcacqfJ8gEkmnmIRSqom%2BU9bPUnIrUxRQ
> > %3D&reserved=0
> > editor.org/rfc/rfc7595#section-3
> >
> > 2. A permanent URI registration is usually expected to broadly meet
> > the requirements for an IETF standard - the obvious way to do this is
> > by publication as a standards track RFC.  Other possible routes (for
> > permanent URI scheme registrations) are as an IETF track
> > informational
> > or experimental RFC, or alternatively as publication as a standard
> > (or
> > equivalent) by an organisation recognised in the IETF as a creator of
> > open standards.
> >
> > I  see at
> > https://www.i/
> > ana.org%2Fassignments%2Fiesg-recognized-
> > &data=05%7C01%7C%7Cc0a1697d391
> > 342c2bde908db9d249928%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638
> > 276552748913695%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2
> > luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=kJ2n%2F7DGS
> > nK1oKF1oyEV2QJvr0hiMg5iM3Uvc4kXmwY%3D&reserved=0
> > organizations/iesg-recognized-organizations.xhtml that OpenId
> > Foundation are recognised in the IETF as a producer of standards.  So
> > for a permanent registration I would be looking for an indication
> > that
> > the specification has passed through whatever consensus process that
> > organisation uses for approving its publications as standards.
> >
> > #g
> >
> > On Mon Aug 14 16:33:23 2023, [e-mail] wrote:
> > >
> > > Contact Name:
> > > Michael B. Jones
> > >
> > > Contact Email:
> > > [e-mail]
> > >
> > > Type of Assignment:
> > > URI Scheme
> > >
> > > Registry:
> > > https://www/
> > > .i%2F&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cc0a1697d391342c2bde908db9d249928%7C84df9e7fe
> > > 9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C638276552748913695%7CUnknown%7CTWF
> > > pbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI
> > > 6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=R5FrjkMssFkgXxnBSqdsPznTqKZnVxb7amGzDe
> > > WhPh0%3D&reserved=0
> > > ana.org%2Fassignments%2Furi-schemes%2Furi-
> > > schemes.xhtml&data=05%7C01%7
> > > C%7Cd178d07404e24b3cbd2008db9d11a826%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaa
> > > aa
> > > a%7C1%7C0%7C638276471382850489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wL
> > > jA
> > > wMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&
> > > sd
> > > ata=wbEf%2FmbUyOb2GBB%2F%2BXzKjpzrHaPfQS1bW0cBgJohmTw%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > Description:
> > > The OpenID Connect protocol has used the "openid" scheme for a
> > > decade but it has never been registered.  Several requests have
> > > come
> > > in over the years to register it.  I requested registration on the
> > > uri- [e-mail] list over two weeks ago and there has been no
> > > response.
> > >
> > > Additional Info:
> > > Please register the "openid" scheme as requested at https://openi/
> > > d.net%2Fspecs%2Fopenid-connect-core-1_0-
> > > &data=05%7C01%7C%7Cd178d07404e
> > > 24b3cbd2008db9d11a826%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C6
> > > 38
> > > 276471382850489%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoi
> > > V2
> > > luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7hY8eTvze
> > > Rl
> > > SleQh%2BdsluxtzXNpxcA008bq7AZGvfjQ%3D&reserved=0
> > > 31.html#URISchemeRegistry.