[Uri-review] apps-review, WGLC: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-02
"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Thu, 30 July 2009 09:12 UTC
Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAEC28C209 for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.455
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.455 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i1ZWv5LpNmoB for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:12:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBE028C1F1 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEADcBcUpAZnme/2dsb2JhbACLDa4IiCeQFQWEEQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,294,1246838400"; d="scan'208";a="52281103"
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2009 09:12:58 +0000
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n6U9Cvwm029783; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 05:12:57 -0400
Received: from dwingwxp01 ([10.21.72.10]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6U9CsFg022020; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:12:55 GMT
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
To: uri-review@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:12:54 +0200
Message-ID: <0aca01ca10f5$ed91fcc0$5f7d150a@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AcoQ8ov/YM9wzQORRlC6NiHyOFf8mAAAA//w
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=852; t=1248945177; x=1249809177; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@cisco.com> |Subject:=20apps-review,=20WGLC=3A=20draft-ietf-behave-turn -uri-02 |Sender:=20 |To:=20<uri-review@ietf.org>; bh=8TG4DxN0XBt/e4NAfC6U+DuH9bXGBqlQ8mgsN+UaWg0=; b=dizM334W9sUlHUUDrJllKhmP/fxFX0HOCGz2L0PjovIB71dPhg+d6Kn94R vmN+XCHQJ4O1Qn06jA0OGSGHjklUHuo3bCAlDJ1dMVO/4ozChqkmRzVKXUqN SdU6LNvayF;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=dwing@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:26:38 -0700
Cc: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri@tools.ietf.org, 'Behave Chairs' <behave-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [Uri-review] apps-review, WGLC: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-02
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:12:58 -0000
(resending to uri-review@ietf.org per Ted Hardie's suggestion.) Hi. BEHAVE just started WGLC of draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-02 and we would like a URI expert to review the document. Thanks, -d -----Original Message----- From: Dan Wing [mailto:dwing@cisco.com] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 10:49 AM To: 'behave@ietf.org' Cc: 'draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri@tools.ietf.org'; 'apps-discuss@ietf.org'; 'Behave Chairs' Subject: WGLC: draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-02 BEHAVE is starting a 3 week working group last call (WGLC), ending August 19, for draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-02 "Traversal Using Relays around NAT (TURN) Uniform Resource Identifiers" *** Review by folks familiar with URIs are encouraged. *** Please send technical comments to the BEHAVE list, and editorial comments to the authors. Thanks, -d