Re: [Uri-review] Request to review about URI scheme

Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> Mon, 27 July 2009 12:17 UTC

Return-Path: <derhoermi@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: uri-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2623B3A68FC for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xxezZIxULsSG for <uri-review@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:17:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CE3443A67C1 for <uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:17:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2009 12:15:41 -0000
Received: from dslb-094-222-154-252.pools.arcor-ip.net (EHLO hive) [94.222.154.252] by mail.gmx.net (mp038) with SMTP; 27 Jul 2009 14:15:41 +0200
X-Authenticated: #723575
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18jv2Iw8GIjq8bGU+NkLmJeosxTCXxyaKkuaxt9aE bj5pJYbetuiGdD
From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
To: Joseph A Holsten <joseph@josephholsten.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:15:43 +0200
Message-ID: <ke6r65d2rr303edh2slcdmf2i9jj7rtjej@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
References: <DF9860F7-1AA1-4B94-9B6A-62B9C6E4E294@josephholsten.com> <7bac1511j86e6sphequmeeecaijp6k3dg7@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de> <97B77D67-06C8-4C6E-89FE-1B2AACA263BC@josephholsten.com>
In-Reply-To: <97B77D67-06C8-4C6E-89FE-1B2AACA263BC@josephholsten.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.76
Cc: uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Uri-review] Request to review about URI scheme
X-BeenThere: uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Proposed URI Schemes <uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review>, <mailto:uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:17:20 -0000

* Joseph A Holsten wrote:
>Let me be sure I understand all of this before I draft the necessary  
>changes:

Your summary sounds about right, except:

>* Request provisional IANA scheme status, removing mention of  
>permanent status

I was pointing out that the draft refers to both permanent and pro-
visional status and should refer only to one of them; whether that
is provisional or permanent is a different matter.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/