Re: draft-seantek-rdf-urn-00 and draft-seantek-xmlns-urn-00

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 19 December 2014 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23D71A8953 for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:00:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u3y8de7RPsgR for <urn-nid@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resqmta-po-04v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-04v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20EA91A00E0 for <urn-nid@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 08:00:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from resomta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.232]) by resqmta-po-04v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id VTzR1p003516pyw01U0oXZ; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:00:48 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([24.34.72.61]) by resomta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net with comcast id VU0n1p0011KKtkw01U0nwl; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:00:48 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id sBJG0kgt021886; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:00:46 -0500
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id sBJG0kHv021882; Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:00:46 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: hobgoblin.ariadne.com: worley set sender to worley@alum.mit.edu using -f
From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
To: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Subject: Re: draft-seantek-rdf-urn-00 and draft-seantek-xmlns-urn-00
In-Reply-To: <69F5E07A-C1FC-4437-B099-064008059D59@seantek.com> (dev+ietf@seantek.com)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:00:46 -0500
Message-ID: <877fxnmxxt.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1419004848; bh=qCTzNN6iRA+JkvhpprL6U21EhDGPGlmvmuE7rg5TRJ8=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID; b=RMRkoo6v8y9ZN1PNVgAESfV7TLYXkYbRHK/x6DMdEfBriXslI1aHkKpKs63gGOkgI zM2oVKQ80POll88q6cQmI2Erf0CNE7B39hcw4HBo0XX5Xeamaf/c0iQxHuCRrVT6+I s1AkHqH6iw3ka3ivgwlAgPU/3neo+PcenQV/H8IfFeZZzCJoyzAAujif9hYs3RwbHB D6KpixdumFwx0DqJf7g3/YuJi+Py7COBoOlxWul13ahKIsWLSVui9zbSKxvfmt42DH K6XuZ76oiSEPhb6P89S/lzbBD7mxQNt2vMifYHfJgHD/l16Z4YK8bwNuJQnO4KaeHn 0P+QPFIr4O7Zg==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/urn-nid/J6urQeJA0pa9H_ASIDyfcRb5g3M
Cc: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: urn-nid@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: discussion of new namespace identifiers for URNs <urn-nid.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/urn-nid/>
List-Post: <mailto:urn-nid@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/urn-nid>, <mailto:urn-nid-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 16:00:55 -0000

Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> writes:
> Actually I would say that the resolution database is not intrinsic to
> the proposal.

If the resolution database is not intrinsic to the proposal, I think you
should remove it from the NID registrations.  The reason for that is
that the resolution process is a major differentiator between this
proposal and a number of others.

Dale